Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure
- PMID: 1669963
- DOI: 10.1121/1.401677
Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure
Erratum in
- J Acoust Soc Am 1994 Feb;95(2):1165
Abstract
The relative hazard posed to the peripheral auditory system by impact/impulse and continuous noise of the same power spectrum was determined. Impact noise was generated by striking a nail with a hammer and was digitally recorded. The acoustical power spectrum of the impact was determined and pink noise was filtered to produce a continuous noise stimulus with the same acoustic power spectrum. Pre-exposure auditory evoked response (AER) thresholds were obtained at 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz on 16 adult chinchillas. The pool of animals was divided into two equal groups based upon pre-exposure AER thresholds. One group was exposed to impact noise and the other group to the filtered pink noise. Exposures were 4 h/day for 5 days. Thirty days following the exposure, auditory evoked response thresholds were remeasured. Changes in auditory sensitivity were determined by subtracting the pre-exposure thresholds from the post-exposure thresholds. Hearing threshold shifts of the impact noise group were significantly greater (p less than 0.0001) than the hearing threshold shifts of the continuous noise group. These data indicate a need to more closely examine the parameters and effects of impact noise. There may be a need to develop expanded damage-risk criteria for occupational exposure to impulse/impact noise.
Similar articles
-
The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul;90(1):197-204. doi: 10.1121/1.402344. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 1880289
-
The role of intermittence in PTS.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul;90(1):164-9. doi: 10.1121/1.401310. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 1880284
-
The importance of "temporal pattern" in traumatic impulse noise exposures.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul;90(1):209-18. doi: 10.1121/1.402361. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 1880291
-
Effects of peak pressure and energy of impulses.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul;90(1):205-8. doi: 10.1121/1.401289. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 1880290 Review.
-
Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jul;90(1):147-54. doi: 10.1121/1.401308. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 1880282 Review.
Cited by
-
Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss: 50 Years of Research and Recommendations from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Semin Hear. 2023 Aug 3;44(4):351-393. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769499. eCollection 2023 Nov. Semin Hear. 2023. PMID: 37818146 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Occupational Hearing Loss from Non-Gaussian Noise.Semin Hear. 2017 Aug;38(3):225-262. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603726. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Semin Hear. 2017. PMID: 28740322 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.Noise Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(78):364-73. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.165067. Noise Health. 2015. PMID: 26356380 Free PMC article.
-
The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3710. doi: 10.1121/1.5132950. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019. PMID: 31795699 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Use of the Kurtosis-Adjusted Cumulative Noise Exposure Metric in Evaluating the Hearing Loss Risk for Complex Noise.Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):312-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000251. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 26671317 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical