Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 May 16;144(10):715-23.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00005.

The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence

Jeanette S Brown  1 , Catherine S Bradley, Leslee L Subak, Holly E Richter, Stephen R Kraus, Linda Brubaker, Feng Lin, Eric Vittinghoff, Deborah Grady; Diagnostic Aspects of Incontinence Study (DAISy) Research Group
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence

Jeanette S Brown et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence is common in women. Because treatments differ, urge incontinence should be distinguished from stress incontinence. To make this distinction, current guidelines recommend an extensive evaluation that is too time-consuming for primary care practice.

Objective: To test the accuracy of a simple questionnaire to categorize type of urinary incontinence in women.

Design: Multicenter, prospective study of the accuracy of the 3 Incontinence Questions (3IQ) compared with an extended evaluation to distinguish between urge incontinence and stress incontinence.

Setting: 5 academic medical centers in the United States.

Participants: 301 women enrolled from April to December 2004 who were older than 40 years of age (mean age, 56 years [SD, 11]) with untreated incontinence for an average of 7 years (SD, 7) and a broad range of incontinence severity.

Measurements: All participants included in the analyses answered the 3IQ questionnaire, and a urologist or urogynecologist who was blinded to the responses performed the extended evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were determined for the 3IQ.

Results: For classification of urge incontinence and with the extended evaluation as the gold standard, the 3IQ had a sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.81), a specificity of 0.77 (CI, 0.69 to 0.84), and a positive likelihood ratio of 3.29 (CI, 2.39 to 4.51). For classification of stress incontinence, the sensitivity was 0.86 (CI, 0.79 to 0.90), the specificity was 0.60 (CI, 0.51 to 0.68), and the positive likelihood ratio was 2.13 (CI, 1.71 to 2.66).

Limitations: Participants were enrolled by urologists and urogynecologists at academic medical centers.

Conclusions: The 3IQ questionnaire is a simple, quick, and noninvasive test with acceptable accuracy for classifying urge and stress incontinence and may be appropriate for use in primary care settings. Similar studies are needed in other populations. We also need a clinical trial comparing the outcomes of treatments based on the 3IQ and the extended evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 3 Incontinence Questions (3IQ).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of study recruitment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Summary for patients in

References

    1. Brown JS, Vittinghoff E, Wyman JF, Stone KL, Nevitt MC, Ensrud KE, et al. Urinary incontinence: does it increase risk for falls and fractures? Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:721–5. [PMID: 10894308] - PubMed
    1. Thom D. Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:473–80. [PMID: 9560071] - PubMed
    1. Thom DH, Haan MN, Van Den Eeden SK. Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality. Age Ageing. 1997;26:367–74. [PMID: 9351481] - PubMed
    1. Roe B, Williams K, Palmer M. Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:CD001308. [PMID: 10796768] - PubMed
    1. Haeusler G, Leitich H, van Trotsenburg M, Kaider A, Tempfer CB. Drug therapy of urinary urge incontinence: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1003–16. [PMID: 12423868] - PubMed

Publication types