Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Sep:450:193-202.
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218760.19934.2b.

Femoral biologic plate fixation

Affiliations
Review

Femoral biologic plate fixation

Costas Papakostidis et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

New techniques of fracture fixation such as indirect reduction, careful soft tissue handling, and elastic fixation are being used in place of older methods of mechanical stabilization. These new techniques led to the concept of biologic plate fixation. We systematically reviewed the literature and provide an overall evaluation of femoral biologic fixation for fracture treatment. We analyzed 19 studies with 687 patients with 697 femoral fractures. Twenty-three percent of the fractures were subtrochanteric, 29% were diaphyseal, and 48% were supracondylar. Twenty-two percent were open fractures. The majority (81%) were comminuted and AO Types B and C. The overall union rate was 98.4%, with a mean time to union ranging from 10.7 to 24 weeks. Primary or secondary bone-grafting procedures were reported in all but one study with a frequency ranging from 0-55%. The most frequently recorded complications were malunion (0-29%) and reoperation (0-23%). The high union rate, low infection rate (2%), and occasional need for bone graft indicate biologic plate fixation is a viable alternative to modern nailing techniques, particularly in patients with polytrauma.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms