Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Jul;20(7):1105-12.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0272-9. Epub 2006 May 13.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia facilitated by robotic assistance

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia facilitated by robotic assistance

C Galvani et al. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is the standard operation for achalasia. The incidence of esophageal perforation is approximately 5% to 10%. Data about the safety and utility of robotically assisted Heller myotomy (RAHM) are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RAHM for the treatment of esophageal achalasia.

Methods: From a prospectively maintained database, demographic data, symptoms, esophagograms, manometries, and perioperative data from all the RAHMs performed between September 2002 and February 2004 were analyzed.

Results: A total of 54 patients underwent RAHM, including 26 men. The mean age of these patients was 43 years (range, 14-75 years). Dysphagia was present in 100% of the patients. Of the 54 patients, 26 (48%) had undergone previous treatment including pneumatic dilation (17 patients), Botox injections (4 patients), or both of these treatments (5 patients). The dissection was performed laparoscopically, and the myotomy was performed with robotic assistance. The operative time, including the robot setup time, averaged 162 min (range, 62-210 min). Blood loss averaged 24 ml. No mucosal perforations were observed. The hospital length of stay was 1.5 days. There were no deaths. At 17 months, 93% of the patients had relief of their dysphagia.

Conclusions: The findings showed RAHM to be safe and effective, with a 0% incidence of perforation and relief of symptoms for 91% of the patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1995;84(2):165-8 - PubMed
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1999 Nov;44(11):2270-6 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 2002 Oct;132(4):716-22; discussion 722-3 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1992 Sep;216(3):291-6; discussion 296-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 May;196(5):698-703; discussion 703-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources