Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):43-6.

Needlescopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned in 10 years of experience

Affiliations

Needlescopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned in 10 years of experience

Morris E Franklin Jr et al. JSLS. 2006 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Needlescopic cholecystectomy (NC) is a refinement of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using 2-mm instruments compared with the standard 5-mm and 10-mm ports. We review our experience with needlescopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: From 1994 to 2004, 303 patients underwent NC. All patients were operated on using 2-mm instruments and one 10-mm trocar for the laparoscope. The characteristics of patients, total operation time, complications, postoperative pain, and hospital course were documented.

Results: Patients' average age was 41.86 years; 262 were female and 41 were male. Mean BMI was 25.7. Mean length of surgery was 59.33 minutes. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in all cases. Mean blood loss was 14.88 mL. One intraoperative complication occurred. Mean hospital stay was 22.68 hours. Postoperative pain was measured on a 0-10 pain scale; on day 0 it was 4.4 and on the first day it was 1.7. Analgesic doses required were 0 doses in 6.89%, 1 in 20.68%, 2 in 24.13%, 3 in 34.48%, 4 in 13.79%, and > 4 doses was not required. No postoperative complications occurred. At 3-month follow-up, patient satisfaction was 100%, and in 99% of patients scars were imperceptible.

Conclusions: NC is safe and feasible without increased operative risk, with better cosmetic results, less pain, and good acceptance among patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trocar placement.

References

    1. Cheah WK, Goh P, Gagner M, So J. Needlescopic retrograde cholecystectomy (Brief Clinical Report). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998; 8: 237–238 - PubMed
    1. Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998; 8: 171–179 - PubMed
    1. Lai EC. Needlescopic cholecystectomy: Prospective study of 150 patients. Hong Kong Med J. 2003; 9: 238–242 - PubMed
    1. Look M. Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001; 46: 138–142 - PubMed
    1. Reardon PR, Kamelgard JI, Applebaum B, Rossman L, Brunicardi FC. Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases. World J Surg. 1999; 23: 128–132 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources