Efficient palliation in patients with small-cell lung cancer by a combination of paclitaxel, etoposide and carboplatin: quality of life and 6-years'-follow-up results from a randomised phase III trial
- PMID: 16713013
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.04.001
Efficient palliation in patients with small-cell lung cancer by a combination of paclitaxel, etoposide and carboplatin: quality of life and 6-years'-follow-up results from a randomised phase III trial
Abstract
Purpose: Based on the promising activity of paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) we conducted a randomized phase III trial to evaluate whether a combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide phosphate (TEC) improves survival and time to progression as well as tolerability and quality of life (QoL) compared to a regimen of carboplatin, etoposide phosphate and vincristine (CEV) in SCLC patients.
Patients and methods: Six hundred and fourteen patients with stages I-IV SCLC were randomly assigned between January 1998 and December 1999 to both treatment arms. All patients were evaluated for response rate, survival, side effects and quality of life with overall survival (OS) serving as primary endpoint. A final analysis was done after a six-year follow-up. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and tested with the log-rank test. Quality of life data were assessed in using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and evaluated by calculating and comparing the mean scores as well as applying longitudinal techniques.
Results: Six hundred and eight patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The long-term follow-up confirms the significant survival benefit for the paclitaxel, etoposide, carboplatin (TEC) regimen with a median OS of 12.5 months compared to 11.7 months for the CEV arm (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43; P=.030). The 5-year survival rates were 14% for the experimental versus 6 % for the CEV arm. Significant survival prolongation was also observed in the subgroup of patients with stage IV disease (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.60; P=.047). The previously reported clinical benefit in form of an overall reduction of grade 3/4 toxicity was backed by the results of the comprehensive QoL analysis we report hereby. TEC significantly improves the relevant QoL parameters like global overall QoL or physical functioning.
Conclusion: When administered in combination with etoposide and carboplatin, paclitaxel is able to offer in SCLC patients with extensive disease a survival benefit without additional toxicities, but with gains in patient-reported quality of life. In terms of efficient palliative care, TEC might be seen as an alternative to standard cisplatin plus etoposide in patients requesting a powerful palliative regimen not compromising any survival benefit.
Similar articles
-
Multicenter randomized open-label phase III study comparing efficacy, safety, and tolerability of conventional carboplatin plus etoposide versus dose-intensified carboplatin plus etoposide plus lenograstim in small-cell lung cancer in "extensive disease" stage.Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb;32(1):61-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31817be954. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19194127 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase III trial of topotecan following carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic cancer intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Aug 2;98(15):1036-45. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj296. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16882940 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparison of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin regimen for treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer].Ai Zheng. 2002 Apr;21(4):412-5. Ai Zheng. 2002. PMID: 12452023 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Paclitaxel-based three-drug combinations for the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a review of the Sarah Cannon Cancer Center experience.Semin Oncol. 2001 Apr;28(2 Suppl 4):43-7. Semin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11479897 Review.
-
Concurrent paclitaxel-containing regimens and thoracic radiation therapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer.Semin Radiat Oncol. 1999 Apr;9(2 Suppl 1):148-50. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10210554 Review.
Cited by
-
The Humanistic Burden of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Literature.Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 15;8:339. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00339. eCollection 2017. Front Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28663730 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidemiology of lung cancer prognosis: quantity and quality of life.Methods Mol Biol. 2009;471:469-86. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-416-2_24. Methods Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19109795 Free PMC article.
-
Modern management of small-cell lung cancer.Drugs. 2007;67(15):2135-52. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767150-00003. Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17927281 Review.
-
Interpreting small treatment differences from quality of life data in cancer trials: an alternative measure of treatment benefit and effect size for the EORTC-QLQ-C30.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Nov 14;13:180. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0374-6. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015. PMID: 26573600 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Reported Physical Function Measures in Cancer Clinical Trials.Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):59-70. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx008. Epidemiol Rev. 2017. PMID: 28453627 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical