Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 May 21;12(19):3108-13.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i19.3108.

Optimal injection volume of epinephrine for endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Optimal injection volume of epinephrine for endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding

Tai-Cherng Liou et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To define the optimal injection volume of epinephrine with high efficacy for hemostasis and low complication rate in patients with actively bleeding ulcers.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, comparative trial was conducted in a medical center. A total of 228 patients with actively bleeding ulcers (spurting or oozing) were randomly assigned to three groups with 20, 30 and 40 mL endoscopic injections of an 1:10000 solution of epinephrine. The hemostatic effects and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in all background variables between the three groups. Initial hemostasis was achieved in 97.4%, 98.7% and 100% of patients respectively in the 20, 30 and 40 mL epinephrine groups. There were no significant differences in the rate of initial hemostasis between the three groups. The rate of peptic ulcer perforation was significantly higher in the 40 mL epinephrine group than in the 20 and 30 mL epinephrine groups (P < 0.05). The rate of recurrent bleeding was significantly higher in the 20 mL epinephrine group (20.3%) than in the 30 (5.3%) and 40 mL (2.8%) epinephrine groups (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the rates of surgical intervention, the amount of transfusion requirements, the days of hospitalization, the deaths from bleeding and 30 d mortality between the three groups. The number of patients who developed epigastric pain due to endoscopic injection, was significantly higher in the 40 mL epinephrine group (51/76) than in the 20 (2/76) and 30 mL (5/76) epinephrine groups (P < 0.001). Significant elevation of systolic blood pressure after endoscopic injection was observed in the 40 mL epinephrine group (P < 0.01). Significant decreasing and normalization of pulse rates after endoscopic injections were observed in the 20 mL and 30 mL epinephrine groups (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Injection of 30 mL diluted epinephrine (1:10000) can effectively prevent recurrent bleeding with a low rate of complications. The optimal injection volume of epinephrine for endoscopic treatment of an actively bleeding ulcer (spurting or oozing) is 30 mL.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ogra R, Lane M, Wong P, Fraser A. Endoscopic injection therapy for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding at Auckland Hospital. N Z Med J. 2002;115:U255. - PubMed
    1. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:843–857. - PubMed
    1. Rollhauser C, Fleischer DE. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy. 2004;36:52–58. - PubMed
    1. Sollano JD, Ang VN, Moreno JA. Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers: 1: 10000 adrenalin injection vs. 1: 10000 adrenalin +1% aethoxysclerol injection vs. heater probe. Gastroenterol Jpn. 1991;26 Suppl 3:83–85. - PubMed
    1. Loizou LA, Bown SG. Endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers: randomised comparison of adrenaline injection and adrenaline injection + Nd: YAG laser photocoagulation. Gut. 1991;32:1100–1103. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms