Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 May 28;12(20):3213-8.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3213.

Surgical perspectives in gastrointestinal disease: a study of quality of life outcomes in esophageal, pancreatic, colon, and rectal cancers

Affiliations
Review

Surgical perspectives in gastrointestinal disease: a study of quality of life outcomes in esophageal, pancreatic, colon, and rectal cancers

Kate-V Viola et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Outcomes assessment in surgery traditionally has included data regarding peri-operative mortality and morbidity, as well as long-term survival and recurrence in surgical oncology. However, quality of life (QOL) is another important patient-related outcome measure. QOL data can be used to tailor treatment and improve clinical outcomes by detecting physical or psychological problems in patients that otherwise might be overlooked, but which have profound implications for the effective delivery of care. We review several well-validated QOL instruments developed specifically for use in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, including esophageal, pancreatic and colorectal cancers, and conclude that QOL assessment routinely should be included in clinical trials of novel treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
To measure QOL, social, psychological and physical domains of illness are assessed using measurement scales (z). QOL (Q) is dependent on both subjective and objective items. For a questionnaire to be validated, Z must equal Q. (Reprinted with permission from Testa et al N Engl J Med 334: 835-840, 1996).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The EORTC QLQ-18 is a specific module for esophageal cancer. Patients complete the questionnaire based on QOL symptoms experienced within the last week. (Reprinted with permission from the EORTC.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
A: QOL after THE in patients with esophageal cancer ≥ 70 years of age. QOL declines sharply for six months and then improves, but the recovery is not durable; B: QOL after THE in patients with esophageal cancer ≤ 55 years of age. QOL declines for six months, but then improves in a more sustained fashion.

References

    1. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assesment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:835–840. - PubMed
    1. Spilker Bert. Quality of Life and Pharmocoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd edition. New York: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 41.
    1. War JE, SnowKK , Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993.
    1. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Mosconi P, Rasmussen NK, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:283–298. - PubMed
    1. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Measurement of quality of life in surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999;44:252–259. - PubMed

MeSH terms