Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Apr;20(4):277-86.
doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr944oa.

A programme of static positional stretches does not reduce hemiplegic shoulder pain or maintain shoulder range of motion--a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A programme of static positional stretches does not reduce hemiplegic shoulder pain or maintain shoulder range of motion--a randomized controlled trial

Louise Gustafsson et al. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a programme of static positional stretches and positioning of the stroke-affected shoulder for maintaining shoulder external rotation and decreasing hemiplegic shoulder pain.

Design: Randomized controlled trial with pretest and posttest design.

Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation unit.

Subjects: Thirty-two participants (17 treatment, 15 comparison) with a first time stroke who were admitted for rehabilitation.

Interventions: Treatment participants completed a programme of static positional stretches of the stroke-affected shoulder twice daily and positioned the stroke-affected upper limb in an armrest support at all other times when seated.

Main measures: The main outcome measures were pain-free range of motion into external rotation, pain in the stroke-affected shoulder at rest and with movement, motor recovery and functional independence.

Results: All participants demonstrated a significant loss of external rotation (P = 0.005) with no significant group differences. All participants demonstrated a significant improvement in motor recovery (P < 0.01) and functional independence (P < 0.01) with no significant group differences. There were no significant effects for pain. The comparison group recorded a decrease in mean pain reported with movement from admission to discharge, and the treatment group recorded an increase.

Conclusions: Participation in the management programme did not result in improved outcomes. The results of this study do not support the application of the programme of static positional stretches to maintain range of motion in the shoulder. The effect of increasing pain for the treatment group requires further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types