Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies
- PMID: 16720074
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018
Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimates made at 28-34 weeks of gestation in predicting small- and large-for-gestational-age infants (SGA, LGA) at term.
Methods: Two-hundred and fifty-nine patients with a healthy, singleton pregnancy in whom fetal biometry measurements were routinely performed between 28 and 34 weeks' gestation, were recruited at term delivery. The sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and the birth weight were converted to percentiles on the basis of locally developed growth charts and compared. Multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis was used to predict the birth weight and birth weight percentile. The resulting equation (projectile formula) was used to determine the calculated birth weight, and that value was compared with the actual birth weight. The Bland and Altman plot and Passing and Bablok regression were used to compare between the calculated birth weight and the actual birth weight.
Results: Mean gestational age at ultrasound examination was 32+/-1.6 weeks (28-34), and mean age at delivery was 39+/-1.7 weeks (37-42). The multivariate correlation between the calculated birth weight and the birth weight (R2 = 0.524) was higher than the correlation between the sonographic EFW and the birth weight (R2 = 0.083). Both the sonographic EFW and the calculated birth weight are characterized by low positive predictive values in predicting SGA or LGA infants. The calculated birth weight was more accurate in excluding SGA and LGA infants (negative predictive values of 99.5% and 100%, respectively). On method comparison tests, the calculated birth weight was not significantly different than the actual birth weight.
Conclusions: Fetal weight estimation at the early third trimester poorly predicts the birth weight centile at term. It remains uncertain, however, if it would be useful to use the calculated birth weight in pregnancies with clinically suspected SGA or LGA fetuses.
Similar articles
-
Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.J Perinat Med. 2008;36(4):324-9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.057. J Perinat Med. 2008. PMID: 18598122
-
Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;29(5):550-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.4019. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17444561
-
Influence of ultrasound-to-delivery interval and maternal-fetal characteristics on validity of estimated fetal weight.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):434-41. doi: 10.1002/uog.7506. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20069655
-
Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):359-64. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355934 Review.
-
Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately.Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00010-0. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9083307 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of sonographic and clinical measures in early versus late third trimester for birth weight prediction.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):774-782. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15911. Epub 2024 Sep 13. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39268669 Free PMC article.
-
Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 13;17(10):e1003190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003190. eCollection 2020 Oct. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 33048935 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor and ultrasound parameters to predict the small-for-gestational-age infant in women presenting with reduced symphysis-fundus height.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):182-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.14860. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25826778 Free PMC article.
-
Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(15):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta25150. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 33656977 Free PMC article.
-
Discriminatory capacity of prenatal ultrasound measures for large-for-gestational-age birth: A Bayesian approach to ROC analysis using placement values.Stat Biosci. 2022 Apr;14(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s12561-021-09311-9. Epub 2021 Jun 5. Stat Biosci. 2022. PMID: 35342482 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical