Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;13(1):45-52.
doi: 10.3758/bf03193811.

Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project

Affiliations

Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project

Boris New et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

In the present study, we reexamined the effect of word length (number of letters in a word) on lexical decision. Using the English Lexicon Project, which is based on a large data set of over 40,481 words (Balota et al., 2002), we performed simultaneous multiple regression analyses on a selection of 33,006 English words (ranging from 3 to 13 letters in length). Our analyses revealed an unexpected pattern of results taking the form of a U-shaped curve. The effect of number of letters was facilitatory for words of 3-5 letters, null for words of 5-8 letters, and inhibitory for words of 8-13 letters. We also showed that printed frequency, number of syllables, and number of orthographic neighbors all made independent contributions. The length effects were replicated in a new analysis of a subset of 3,833 monomorphemic nouns (ranging from 3 to 10 letters), and also in another analysis based on 12,987 bisyllabic items (ranging from 3 to 9 letters). These effects were independent of printed frequency, number of syllables, and number of orthographic neighbors. Furthermore, we also observed robust linear inhibitory effects of number of syllables. Implications for models of visual word recognition are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Psychol. 1976 Aug;67(3):315-25 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1188-200 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol. 1952 Aug;44(2):65-9 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Jun;41(6):401-10 - PubMed
    1. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(12):1680-8 - PubMed