Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;65(12):1658-60.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.051250. Epub 2006 May 25.

Assessing the intra- and inter-reader reliability of dynamic ultrasound images in power Doppler ultrasonography

Affiliations

Assessing the intra- and inter-reader reliability of dynamic ultrasound images in power Doppler ultrasonography

J M Koski et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the intra-reader and inter-reader reliabilities of interpreting ultrasonography by several experts using video clips.

Method: 99 video clips of healthy and rheumatic joints were recorded and delivered to 17 physician sonographers in two rounds. The intra-reader and inter-reader reliabilities of interpreting the ultrasound results were calculated using a dichotomous system (normal/abnormal) and a graded semiquantitative scoring system.

Results: The video reading method worked well. 70% of the readers could classify at least 70% of the cases correctly as normal or abnormal. The distribution of readers answering correctly was wide. The most difficult joints to assess were the elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and knee joints. The intra-reader and inter-reader agreements on interpreting dynamic ultrasound images as normal or abnormal, as well as detecting and scoring a Doppler signal were moderate to good (kappa = 0.52-0.82).

Conclusions: Dynamic image assessment (video clips) can be used as an alternative method in ultrasonography reliability studies. The intra-reader and inter-reader reliabilities of ultrasonography in dynamic image reading are acceptable, but more definitions and training are needed to improve sonographic reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Szkudlarek M, Court‐Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen H S, Ostergaard M. Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 200348955–962. - PubMed
    1. Karim Z, Wakefield R J, Quinn M, Conaghan P G, Brown A K, Veale D J.et al Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee. Arthritis Rheum 200450387–394. - PubMed
    1. Wakefield R J, Gibbon W W, Conaghan P G, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C.et al The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000432762–2770. - PubMed
    1. Swen W A A, Jacobs J W G, Algra P R, Manoliu R A, Rijkmans J, Willems W J.et al Sonography and magnetic resonance imaging equivalent for the assessment of full‐thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthritis Rheum 1999422231–2238. - PubMed
    1. Middleton W D, Teefey S A, Yamaguchi K. Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol 20041831465–1468. - PubMed

Publication types