Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;15(3):247-53.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015347.

The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity

Affiliations

The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity

L Joossens et al. Tob Control. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the implementation of tobacco control policies at country level using a new Tobacco Control Scale and to report initial results using the scale.

Method: A questionnaire sent to correspondents in 30 European countries, using a scoring system designed with the help of a panel of international tobacco control experts.

Results: The 30 countries are ranked by their total score on the scale out of a maximum possible score of 100. Only four countries (Ireland, United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland) scored 70 or more, with an eight point gap (most differences in scores are small) to the fifth country, Malta, on 62. Only 13 countries scored above 50, 11 of them from the European Union (EU), and the second largest points gap occurs between Denmark on 45 and Portugal on 39, splitting the table into three groups: 70 and above, 45 to 62, 39 and below. Ireland had the highest overall score, 74 out of 100, and Luxembourg was bottom with 26 points. However even Ireland, much praised for their ban on smoking in public places, did not increase tobacco taxes in 2005, for the first time since 1995.

Conclusions: Although the Tobacco Control Scale has limitations, this is the first time such a scale has been developed and applied to so many countries. We hope it will be useful in encouraging countries to strengthen currently weak areas of their tobacco control policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LJ, none; MR, none.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Bank Tobacco control at a glance. Washington DC, 2003. www.worldbank.org/tobacco
    1. Action on Smoking and Health ASH response to Securing good health for the whole population. London: ASH, 2003
    1. Levy D, Chaloupka F, Gitchell J. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 200410338–353. - PubMed
    1. Jha P, Chaloupka F.Curbing the epidemic. Governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington DC: The World Bank, 1999 - PubMed
    1. INPES (National Health Promotion Institute) Enquête sur la prevalence du tabagisme en décembre 2003 (Survey on the prevalence of smoking in December 2003), Paris: 1 February 2004

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances