Similar articles

• Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.

  O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. O'Brien E, et al. Lancet. 1990 Dec 15;336(8729):1465-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-q. Lancet. 1990. PMID: 1979092 Clinical Trial.
• Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?

  Mackie A, Whincup P, McKinnon M. Mackie A, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 1995 May;9(5):337-43. J Hum Hypertens. 1995. PMID: 7623370 Clinical Trial.
• Using Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer as a gold standard may result in misleading conclusions.

  Conroy RM, Atkins N, Mee F, O'Brien E, O'Malley K. Conroy RM, et al. Blood Press. 1994 Sep;3(5):283-6. doi: 10.3109/08037059409102275. Blood Press. 1994. PMID: 7866591
• Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement.

  O'Brien E. O'Brien E. Blood Press Monit. 2003 Feb;8(1):19-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000057012.67622.de. Blood Press Monit. 2003. PMID: 12604931 Review.
• A review of common errors in the indirect measurement of blood pressure. Sphygmomanometry.

  Bailey RH, Bauer JH. Bailey RH, et al. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Dec 27;153(24):2741-8. Arch Intern Med. 1993. PMID: 8257249 Review.