Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;3(6):e231.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030231.

Sacred cows and sympathetic squirrels: the importance of biological diversity to human health

Affiliations

Sacred cows and sympathetic squirrels: the importance of biological diversity to human health

Andy Dobson et al. PLoS Med. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Dobson and colleagues describe how some host species act to reduce the risk of transmission of virulent zoonotic pathogens to humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cow and Proud Owner in Dacca, Bangladesh
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two Juvenile White-Footed Mice ( Peromyscus leucopus) That Have Been Placed in a Plastic Pail before Being Marked with Ear Tags and Released
Mice are important reservoirs for the pathogens that cause Lyme disease, human babesiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, and many other diseases. They thrive in low-diversity vertebrate communities that support few predators and competitors.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A Bobcat ( Lynx rufus) Drawn to a Scent Lure Placed near an Infrared-Triggered Camera
This species is highly sensitive to forest fragmentation, requiring extensive tracts of habitat to support viable populations. Bobcats and other species of mammalian carnivores are important components of diversity that appear to function both as regulators of pathogen reservoirs such as white-footed mice and as hosts that might deflect tick meals away from more competent reservoirs for zoonotic pathogens.

References

    1. Service MW. Agricultural development and arthropod-borne diseases: A review. Rev Saude Publica. 1991;25:167–178. - PubMed
    1. Sota T, Mogi M. Effectiveness of zooprophylaxis in malaria control: A theoretical inquiry, with a model for mosquito populations with two bloodmeal hosts. Med Vet Entomol. 1989;3:337–345. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Joint WHO/FAO/UNEP panel of experts on environmental management for vector control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991. 80 pp.
    1. Bouma MJ, Rowland M. Failure of passive zooprophylaxis: Cattle ownership in Pakistan associated with a higher prevalence of malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89:351–353. - PubMed
    1. Soule ME. Conservation: Tactics for a constant crisis. Science. 1991;253:744–750. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms