Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;16(12):2721-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0280-8. Epub 2006 May 30.

Effects of iodinated contrast media on common carotid and brachial artery blood flow and wall shear stress

Affiliations

Effects of iodinated contrast media on common carotid and brachial artery blood flow and wall shear stress

C Irace et al. Eur Radiol. 2006 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Eur Radiol. 2006 Dec;16(12):2885. Tamburini, S [corrected to Tamburrini, S]

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of the intravenous contrast media iomeprol on wall shear stress, blood flow and vascular parameters in the common carotid and brachial artery. Thirty outpatients undergoing thoracic or abdominal spiral CT scans were studied. The internal diameter and flow velocity of the common carotid and brachial artery were evaluated by ultrasound, and blood viscosity was measured before and after low osmolality iomeprol (Iomeron 350) injection. The wall shear stress, blood flow and pulsatility index were calculated. To test the differences between groups, the Wilcoxon rank test and Mann Whitney U test were applied. Blood viscosity decreased slightly, but significantly after contrast media (4.6+/-0.7 vs. 4.5+/-0.7 mPa.s, P = 0.02). Contrarily, blood flow and wall shear stress did not change in the common carotid artery, but significantly decreased in the brachial artery (0.9+/-0.4 vs. 0.6+/-0.3 ml/s, P < 0.0001, and 41.5+/-13.9 vs. 35.3+/-11.0 dynes/cm2, P < 0.002, respectively), whereas the pulsatility index significantly increased in the brachial artery (5.0+/-3.3 vs. 7.5+/-5.3, P < 0.001). Iomeprol injection causes blood flow and wall shear stress reduction of the brachial artery; the rise in the pulsatility index suggests an increase in peripheral vascular resistance. Further investigation is needed to evaluate whether these modifications can be clinically relevant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):1039-45 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol. 2003 Jan;44(1):111-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1997 Jul;273(1 Pt 2):H104-12 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1995 Sep;196(3):661-5 - PubMed
    1. Thromb Res. 1999 Nov 15;96(4):253-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources