Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 May 27;332(7552):1266-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1266.

Review of NICE's recommendations, 1999-2005

Affiliations
Review

Review of NICE's recommendations, 1999-2005

James Raftery. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ. 2006 Jul 15;333(7559):137
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Yes but Credit: AKG IMAGES

Comment in

  • How NICE may be outflanked.
    Ferner RE, McDowell SE. Ferner RE, et al. BMJ. 2006 May 27;332(7552):1268-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1268. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16735342 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
  • NICE work: nice try.
    Shuster S. Shuster S. BMJ. 2006 Jun 10;332(7554):1394. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7554.1394. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16763270 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ham C, Robert G. Conclusions. In: Reasonable rationing. International experience of priority setting in health care. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2003: 141-56.
    1. Duckett SJ. Drug policy down under: Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme. Health Care Financing Review 2004;25(3): 55-67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter RJ, Mulder RT. PHARMAC and availability of pharmaceuticals. N Z Med 2002;115: 274-5. - PubMed
    1. Corvari R, King D, Sanidas M. Canada: pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement. London: London School of Economics, 2005.
    1. Stiftung B. Centre for quality in medicine: from policy paper to draft bill. Westphalia: Health Policy Monitor, 2004.

MeSH terms