Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;91(8):2906-12.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0594. Epub 2006 May 30.

Body mass index, metabolic syndrome, and risk of type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease

Affiliations

Body mass index, metabolic syndrome, and risk of type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease

James B Meigs et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Context: Metabolic risk conferred by adiposity may be due to associated risk factor clustering.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess risk for diabetes or cardiovascular disease (CVD) stratified by body mass index (BMI) and the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) or insulin resistance (IR).

Design, setting, and participants: This was a community-based, longitudinal study of 2902 people (55% women, mean age 53 yr) without diabetes or CVD in 1989-1992 followed for up to 11 yr. We categorized subjects by normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), or obese (>30 kg/m(2)) and by the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel MetS or the top quartile of homeostasis model IR. We used proportional hazard models to estimate risk relative to normal weight and no MetS or IR.

Main outcome measure: Incident type 2 diabetes (treatment or fasting glucose > or = 7 mmol/liter, 141 events) or CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, or claudication, 252 events) were measured.

Results: Among 1056 normal-weight subjects, 7% had MetS and a risk factor-adjusted relative risk for diabetes of 3.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-11.6) and for CVD of 3.01 (1.68-5.41). Among 638 obese subjects, 37% did not have MetS or significantly increased risk. Obese subjects with MetS had an adjusted relative risk for diabetes of 10.3 (5.44-19.5) and for CVD of 2.13 (1.43-3.18). Results were similar in analyses of BMI-IR categories.

Conclusions: People with normal weight and MetS or IR or with obesity but no MetS or IR were not uncommon in our sample. Risk factor clustering or IR appear to confer much of the risk for diabetes or CVD commonly associated with elevated BMI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types