Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Apr;32(2):159-65.
doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70263-x.

Reinforced follow-up for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control: a randomized controlled trial intervention via the local pharmacist and telecare

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reinforced follow-up for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control: a randomized controlled trial intervention via the local pharmacist and telecare

C L Gay et al. Diabetes Metab. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of reinforced follow-up via telecare mediated by the local pharmacist in contact with the hospital team to improve glycaemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (DT1).

Methods: One hundred patients, aged 8 to 17 years, with a history of DT1 of more than 1 year, with HbA(1c) >=8%, were randomly assigned to either the "reinforced follow-up" group (RFG) or the "usual follow-up" group (UFG). The intervention consisted in downloading and then printing data stored in a glucometer every two weeks, by the local pharmacist. Printouts were faxed to the hospital team which then communicated adapted instructions for better glycemic control directly to the family.

Results: Fifty patients were assigned to each group. The two groups were comparable at the beginning. 71 children had a doctor's visit at 6 +/- 1 months (36 in RFG and 35 in UFG). At this date, there was no significant difference between the average HbA(1c) levels of the two groups (9.12 +/- 1.46 in RFG versus 9.27 +/- 1.20 in UFG). We had various difficulties setting up and gaining compliance with the intervention procedure, which explains why only 33 children in the RFG transmitted at least one fax.

Conclusion: At this stage, the reinforced follow-up has not proved to be superior to the usual follow-up. However, it would be possible to make numerous improvements in order to make the former more feasible and probably more efficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources