Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May 31:7:130.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-130.

A wing expressed sequence tag resource for Bicyclus anynana butterflies, an evo-devo model

Affiliations

A wing expressed sequence tag resource for Bicyclus anynana butterflies, an evo-devo model

Patrícia Beldade et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Butterfly wing color patterns are a key model for integrating evolutionary developmental biology and the study of adaptive morphological evolution. Yet, despite the biological, economical and educational value of butterflies they are still relatively under-represented in terms of available genomic resources. Here, we describe an Expression Sequence Tag (EST) project for Bicyclus anynana that has identified the largest available collection to date of expressed genes for any butterfly.

Results: By targeting cDNAs from developing wings at the stages when pattern is specified, we biased gene discovery towards genes potentially involved in pattern formation. Assembly of 9,903 ESTs from a subtracted library allowed us to identify 4,251 genes of which 2,461 were annotated based on BLAST analyses against relevant gene collections. Gene prediction software identified 2,202 peptides, of which 215 longer than 100 amino acids had no homology to any known proteins and, thus, potentially represent novel or highly diverged butterfly genes. We combined gene and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) identification by constructing cDNA libraries from pools of outbred individuals, and by sequencing clones from the 3' end to maximize alignment depth. Alignments of multi-member contigs allowed us to identify over 14,000 putative SNPs, with 316 genes having at least one high confidence double-hit SNP. We furthermore identified 320 microsatellites in transcribed genes that can potentially be used as genetic markers.

Conclusion: Our project was designed to combine gene and sequence polymorphism discovery and has generated the largest gene collection available for any butterfly and many potential markers in expressed genes. These resources will be invaluable for exploring the potential of B. anynana in particular, and butterflies in general, as models in ecological, evolutionary, and developmental genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Contig alignment depth and SNP identification. Of the 4,251 UniGenes (contigs) identified, 2,994 were singletons (not shown) and all others had two or more ESTs (i.e., alignment depth of two or greater). The total number of contigs for each alignment depth class is represented by the height of the columns, and the different colors represent different SNP number classes. It should be noted that alignment depth here refers to the number of ESTs in each contig and does not necessarily imply a constant alignment depth at all sites along the contig sequence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UniGene identification through BLAST analyses toselected genomic collections. a) Venn diagram summarizing gene identification based on BLAST against the genomic collections phylogenetically most relevant for B. anynana: "Dmel" for D. melanogaster, "Bmori" for the silkworm B. mori, and "InvLep" for lepidopteran nucleotide sequences and invertebrate proteins (see Methods and Table 3). About 42% of our 4,251 UniGenes did not have a significant BLAST hit for any of these three categories. b) Of the 1,804 genes not included in the Venn diagram, 14 showed a significant BLAST hit to at least one of the additional collections analyzed (details in Table 3 and in the text). The numbers on the left panel represent BLAST hits to groups of these collections (with some overlap across the collections).

References

    1. Pennisi E, Roush W. Developing a new view of evolution. Science. 1997;277:34–37. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.34. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodman CS, Coughlin BC. The evolution of evo-devo biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4424–4425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4424. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raff RA. Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline. Nat Rev Genet. 2000;1:74–79. doi: 10.1038/35049594. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arthur W. The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature. 2002;415:757–764. - PubMed
    1. Corley LS. Radical paradigm shifts in Evo-Devo. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:544–545. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02632-0. - DOI

Publication types