Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 May 31:6:23.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-23.

A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection

Shannon J Lane  1 , Nancy M Heddle, Emmy Arnold, Irwin Walker
Affiliations
Review

A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection

Shannon J Lane et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Handheld computers are increasingly favoured over paper and pencil methods to capture data in clinical research.

Methods: This study systematically identified and reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the two methods for self-recording and reporting data, and where at least one of the following outcomes was assessed: data accuracy; timeliness of data capture; and adherence to protocols for data collection.

Results: A comprehensive key word search of NLM Gateway's database yielded 9 studies fitting the criteria for inclusion. Data extraction was performed and checked by two of the authors. None of the studies included all outcomes. The results overall, favor handheld computers over paper and pencil for data collection among study participants but the data are not uniform for the different outcomes. Handheld computers appear superior in timeliness of receipt and data handling (four of four studies) and are preferred by most subjects (three of four studies). On the other hand, only one of the trials adequately compared adherence to instructions for recording and submission of data (handheld computers were superior), and comparisons of accuracy were inconsistent between five studies.

Conclusion: Handhelds are an effective alternative to paper and pencil modes of data collection; they are faster and were preferred by most users.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. van Gerven JM, Schoemaker RC, Jacobs LD, Reints A, MJ OM, Hoedemaker HG, Cohen AF. Self-medication of a single headache episode with ketoprofen, ibuprofen or placebo, home-monitored with an electronic patient diary. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42:475–481. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.43613.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Levine JG, Slawsby EA, Nedeljkovic SS, Katz NP. Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain. 2001;91:277–285. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00450-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scharer LO, Hartweg V, Hoern M, Graesslin Y, Strobl N, Frey S, Biedermann C, Walser S, Walden J. Electronic diary for bipolar patients. Neuropsychobiology. 2002;46 Suppl 1:10–12. - PubMed
    1. Hyland ME, Kenyon CA, Allen R, Howarth P. Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods. BMJ. 1993;306:487–489. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caro JJS, Caro I, Caro J, Wouters F, Juniper EF. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? Qual Life Res. 2001;10:683–691. doi: 10.1023/A:1013811109820. - DOI - PubMed