Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep;19(3):258-63.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-0592-x.

Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography

Silvia Obenauer  1 , Christian Sohns, Carola Werner, Eckhardt Grabbe
Affiliations

Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography

Silvia Obenauer et al. J Digit Imaging. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography (Senographe 2000D, General Electric, Buc, France) in finding out carcinomas depending on the parenchymal density. A total of 226 mediolateral oblique (MLO) and 186 craniocaudal (CC) mammographic views of histologically proven cancers were retrospectively evaluated with a digital CAD system (ImageChecker V2.3 R2 Technology, Los Altos, CA, USA). Malignant tumors were detected correctly by CAD in MLO view in 84.85% in breasts with parenchymal tissue density of the American College of Radiology (ACR) type 1, in 70.33% of the ACR type 2, in 68.12% of the ACR type 3, and in 69.70% of the ACR type 4. For the CC view, similar results were found according to the ACR types. Using the chi-square and McNemar tests, there was no statistical significance. However, a trend of better detection could be seen with decreasing ACR type. In conclusion, there seems to be a tendency for breast tissue density to affect the detection rate of breast cancer when using the CAD system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
True positive marker in CC view (a); no marker in MLO view (b). Mass near the thoracic wall.
Fig 2
Fig 2
True-positive and false-positive CAD markers in different breast tissue types. (a, b) Breast cancer with true positive markers for the microcalcifications (∇) and the mass (*) of the tumor in the upper quadrant of the breast in MLO (a) and CC (b) view in a fatty-type breast (ACR type 1). False-positive marker in the middle of the breast (vessel calcification) in MLO view. (c, d) Mass in a fibroglandular breast tissue (ACR type 2) with true positive marker in MLO (c) and CC view (d). (e, f) True positive markers in a breast with heterogeneously dense breast tissue (ACR type 3) with a bifocal mass in MLO view (e). Only one marker in CC view (f). (g, h) True positive markers of a cancer with diffuse pleomorphic microcalcifications in an extremely dense breast (ACR type 4).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Moskowitz M. Screening for breast cancer: how effective are our test? A critical review. CA Cancer J Clin. 1983;33:26–39. - PubMed
    1. Rennie J, Rusting R. Making headway against cancer. Sci Am. 1996;3:56–59. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0996-56. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bird RE. Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. Radiology. 1990;77:8–10. - PubMed
    1. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Lam KL, Ogura T, Wu YZ, MacMahon H. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 1990;25:1102–1110. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199010000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng B, Chang YH, Staiger M, Good W, Gur D. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995;2:655–662. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80431-3. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms