[Variance of identification of femoral epicondyles in navigated total knee arthroplasty]
- PMID: 16741750
- DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0975-1
[Variance of identification of femoral epicondyles in navigated total knee arthroplasty]
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study were the quantification of the accuracy of registration of the epicondylar axis (EA) in navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the identification of presumed factors influencing this accuracy.
Methods: A total of 32 navigated TKAs were performed and the surgical EA registered. Postoperatively, the difference from the surgical EA determined by computed tomography was calculated. Presumed factors influencing the accuracy were sex, preoperative malalignment, stability and range of motion, operated side, body mass index, and component size.
Results: The absolute error was calculated to be 1.4+/-1.3 degrees . Alignment according to the intraoperatively defined axes would have resulted in three outliers (>3 degrees malalignment). The operated side was the only factor showing a significant effect on the accuracy. The absolute error in left knee joints was calculated to be 0.9+/-0.7 degrees (max. 2.4 degrees ) and in right knee joints to be 2.0+/-1.5 degrees (max. 5 degrees, p=0.021).
Conclusions: The surgeon stood on the patient's right side in every case, so that right knee joints were operated from the lateral and left ones from the medial side. A medial position of the surgeon to the knee joint during registration of EA is recommended because it results in a higher accuracy than a lateral position.
Comment in
-
[Investigation of the accuracy of various techniques for measuring the epicondylar axis].Orthopade. 2007 Feb;36(2):165-6; author reply 166. doi: 10.1007/s00132-007-1043-1. Orthopade. 2007. PMID: 17235558 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Accuracy of determination of the hip centre in navigated total knee arthroplasty].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006 Jul-Aug;144(4):362-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-942123. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006. PMID: 16941292 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Femur positioning in navigated total knee arthroplasty.Orthopedics. 2012 Oct;35(10 Suppl):45-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-57. Orthopedics. 2012. PMID: 23026252
-
Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2476-82. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3863-6. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 26581366
-
Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):386-94. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1193799. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27249110 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.J Surg Res. 2011 Dec;171(2):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Oct 31. J Surg Res. 2011. PMID: 21176919 Review.
Cited by
-
[The Berlin diagnostic algorithm for painful knee TKA].Orthopade. 2016 Jan;45(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3196-7. Orthopade. 2016. PMID: 26679494 Review. German.
-
Kinematic analysis of the flexion axis for correct femoral component placement.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1504-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1554-5. Epub 2011 May 25. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. PMID: 21611781
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical