Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep 1;91(5):1811-22.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.084335. Epub 2006 Jun 2.

Chromophore structure in the photocycle of the cyanobacterial phytochrome Cph1

Affiliations

Chromophore structure in the photocycle of the cyanobacterial phytochrome Cph1

Jasper J van Thor et al. Biophys J. .

Abstract

The chromophore conformations of the red and far red light induced product states "Pfr" and "Pr" of the N-terminal photoreceptor domain Cph1-N515 from Synechocystis 6803 have been investigated by NMR spectroscopy, using specific 13C isotope substitutions in the chromophore. 13C-NMR spectroscopy in the Pfr and Pr states indicated reversible chemical shift differences predominantly of the C(4) carbon in ring A of the phycocyanobilin chromophore, in contrast to differences of C15 and C5, which were much less pronounced. Ab initio calculations of the isotropic shielding and optical transition energies identify a region for C4-C5-C6-N2 dihedral angle changes where deshielding of C4 is correlated with red-shifted absorption. These could occur during thermal reactions on microsecond and millisecond timescales after excitation of Pr which are associated with red-shifted absorption. A reaction pathway involving a hula-twist at C5 could satisfy the observed NMR and visible absorption changes. Alternatively, C15 Z-E photoisomerization, although expected to lead to a small change of the chemical shift of C15, in addition to changes of the C4-C5-C6-N2 dihedral angle could be consistent with visible absorption changes and the chemical shift difference at C4. NMR spectroscopy of a 13C-labeled chromopeptide provided indication for broadening due to conformational exchange reactions in the intact photoreceptor domain, which is more pronounced for the C- and D-rings of the chromophore. This broadening was also evident in the F2 hydrogen dimension from heteronuclear 1H-13C HSQC spectroscopy, which did not detect resonances for the 13C5-H, 13C10-H, and 13C15-H hydrogen atoms whereas strong signals were detected for the (13)C-labeled chromopeptide. The most pronounced 13C-chemical shift difference between chromopeptide and intact receptor domain was that of the 13C4-resonance, which could be consistent with an increased conformational energy of the C4-C5-C6-N2 dihedral angle in the intact protein in the Pr state. Nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy experiments of the 13C-labeled chromopeptide, where chromophore-protein interactions are expected to be reduced, were consistent with a ZZZssa conformation, which has also been found for the biliverdin chromophore in the x-ray structure of a fragment of Deinococcus radiodurans bacteriophytochrome in the Pr form.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
1H-broadband decoupled 13C-NMR spectra of labeled (solid lines) and unlabeled (dashed lines) intact Cph1-N515 (A) and chromopeptide (B) identify signals belonging to 13C4, 13C5, 13C9, 13C10, 13C11, 13C15, and 13C19. Labeled and unlabeled Cph1-N515 and derived chromopeptides were at 200-μM concentration, and spectra shown for comparison are not scaled in intensity.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Conformational exchange reactions of the chromophore in the intact protein. (A) 13C-NMR spectra of the 13C5 and 13C15 carbons in Cph1-N515 (solid line) and chromopeptide (dashed line) under identical experimental conditions and concentration. Arrows indicate chromophore peaks. (B) 1H-13C HSQC crosspeaks for the 13C5-H and 13C15-H protons in the labeled chromopeptide. No peaks were observed in this region in unlabeled chromopeptide under identical conditions. (C) 13C-NMR spectra of the 13C10 triplet in Cph1-N515 (solid line) and chromopeptide (dashed line), indicated with arrows. (D). 1H-13C HSQC crosspeaks of the 13C10-H triplet in the labeled chromopeptide (light contours) shown together with the unlabeled chromopeptide, which shows contributions from superimposed resonances at natural abundance in this region (dark contours).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
1H-1H-NOESY traces parallel to F2 at 5.68 and 6.29 ppm of the 13C-labeled chromopeptide. NOESY experiment was run without 13C-decoupling in F2 to demonstrate the JCH coupling in the C5-H and C15-H bonds. The brackets and arrows indicate the position of collapsed diagonal peaks as seen in fully decoupled experiments. Artifacts are marked with “X”, and NOE crosspeaks are marked with small arrows.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
13C-NMR spectroscopy of Pr and Pfr states. The Pr state was obtained in pure form after saturating illumination with >705 nm far red light. A mixture of Pfr and Pr states was obtained after illumination of the concentrated sample in a thin capillary with red light, 640 nm.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Molecular properties with C4-C5-C6-N2 dihedral angle changes. A relaxed C4-C5-C6-N2 dihedral angle scan was performed of the ZZZ(s)sa (AC) (•) and EZZ(s)sa (DF) (▴) geometries. DFT conformational energies (/kJ/mol) (A and D) are given relative to the lowest conformation. Isotropic chemical shielding values are given for the 13C4-carbon relative to TMS (/ppm) (B and E). TDDFT optical transition energies computed for the pure HOMO-LUMO transition (/eV) (C and F).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Chromophore models and key calculated properties. The conformational models shown are the optimized geometries at the DFT MPW1PW91 6-31G(d,p) level also used for the GIAO and TDDFT calculations but additionally contain the carboxylic acid groups which were excluded in the calculations. Dihedral angle restraints used in the geometry optimization, the calculated isotropic shielding for C4 and the TDDFT excitation energy are listed as a summary of the results, which are discussed. (A) ZZZssa model obtained after geometry optimization as taken from the Bph x-ray structure. (B) ZZEssa structure based on A. (C) ZZZssa structure including only the C4-C5-C6-N2 dihedral angle restraint. (D) EZZasa structure based on C.

References

    1. Wagner, J. R., J. S. Brunzelle, K. T. Forest, and R. D. Vierstra. 2005. A light-sensing knot revealed by the structure of the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome. Nature. 438:325–331. - PubMed
    1. Montgomery, B. L., and J. C. Lagarias. 2002. Phytochrome ancestry: sensors of bilins and light. Trends Plant Sci. 7:357–366. - PubMed
    1. Lamparter, T. 2004. Evolution of cyanobacterial and plant phytochromes. FEBS Lett. 573:1–5. - PubMed
    1. Butler, W. L., K. H. Norris, H. W. Siegelman, and S. B. Hendricks. 1959. Detection, assay and preliminary purification of the pigment controlling photoresponsive developments of plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 45:1703–1708. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly, J. M., and J. C. Lagarias. 1985. Photochemistry of 124 kilodalton Avena phytochrome under constant illumination in vitro. Biochemistry. 24:6003–6010.

Publication types

MeSH terms