Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;72(6):4007-11.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02573-05.

Effect of growth in biofilms on chlorine susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare

Affiliations

Effect of growth in biofilms on chlorine susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare

Keesha A Steed et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare were grown in suspension and in biofilms, and their susceptibilities to chlorine were measured. M. avium and M. intracellulare readily adhered within 2 h, and numbers increased 10-fold in 30 days at room temperature in biofilms on both polystyrene flasks and glass beads. The chlorine resistance of M. avium and M. intracellulare cells grown and exposed to chlorine in biofilms was significantly higher than that of cells grown in suspension. Survival curves showed no evidence of a resistant, persisting population after 6 h of exposure to 1 mug chlorine/ml. The chlorine susceptibility of cells grown in biofilms and exposed in suspension (cells detached from bead surfaces) was also significantly higher than that of cells grown and exposed in suspension (planktonic cells), although it was lower than that of cells grown and exposed in biofilms. The higher resistance of the detached biofilm-grown cells was reversed upon their growth in suspension. There was a strong correlation between the chlorine susceptibility of cells of both M. avium and M. intracellulare and cell surface hydrophobicity measured by contact angle for both biofilm- and suspension-grown cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bardouniotis, E., W. Huddleston, H. Ceri, and M. E. Olson. 2001. Characterization of biofilm growth and biocide susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium phlei using the MBEC TM assay system. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 203:263-267. - PubMed
    1. Beggs, M. L., J. T. Crawford, and K. D. Eisenach. 1995. Isolation and sequencing of the replication region of Mycobacterium avium plasmid pLR7. J. Bacteriol. 177:4836-4840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendinger, B., H. H. M. Rijnaarts, K. Altendorf, and A. J. B. Zehnder. 1993. Physiochemical cell surface and adhesive properties of coryneform bacteria related to the presence and chain length of mycolic acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:3973-3977. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan, P. J., and H. Nikaido. 1995. The envelope of mycobacteria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:29-63. - PubMed
    1. Brooks, R. W., K. L. George, B. C. Parker, J. O. Falkinham III, and H. Gruft. 1984. Recovery and survival of nontuberculous mycobacteria under various growth and decontamination conditions. Can. J. Microbiol. 30:1112-1117. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources