Growth kinetics and competition between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in mesophilic anaerobic digestion
- PMID: 16752610
- DOI: 10.2175/106143006x95393
Growth kinetics and competition between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in mesophilic anaerobic digestion
Abstract
Methanosarcina species with a high maximum specific growth rate (mumax) and high half-saturation coefficient (KS) and Methanosaeta species with a low mumax and low KS are the only known aceticlastic methanogens. Because of Methanosaeta's low KS, the low acetate concentrations in conventional, mesophilic anaerobic digestion yield Methanosaeta dominance. However, Methanosarcina absorbs increases in acetate more efficiently and thus promotes more stable digestion. This paper tests the hypothesis that decreasing digester feeding frequencies can increase Methanosarcina predominance. Two acetate-fed reactors were established at a 17-day solids retention time. One reactor was fed hourly, and one was fed once daily. Microscopic and molecular methods were used to verify that the hourly fed reactor enriched for Methanosaeta, while the daily fed reactor enriched for Methanosarcina. Growth and substrate-use kinetics were measured for each reactor. A digester overload condition was simulated, and the Methanosarcina-enriched reactor was found to perform better than the Methanosaeta-enriched reactor. These findings indicate that Methanosarcina dominance can be achieved with infrequent feedings, leading to more stable digestion.
Similar articles
-
Immobilization patterns and dynamics of acetate-utilizing methanogens immobilized in sterile granular sludge in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Mar;65(3):1050-4. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.3.1050-1054.1999. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999. PMID: 10049862 Free PMC article.
-
Methanosarcina as the dominant aceticlastic methanogens during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of putrescible waste.Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008 Nov;94(4):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s10482-008-9279-2. Epub 2008 Sep 13. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008. PMID: 18791805
-
Persistence of Methanosaeta populations in anaerobic digestion during process instability.J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Aug;42(8):1129-37. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1632-7. Epub 2015 May 9. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015. PMID: 25956380
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen?Trends Microbiol. 2007 Apr;15(4):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Feb 21. Trends Microbiol. 2007. PMID: 17320399 Review.
Cited by
-
Repeated pulse feeding induces functional stability in anaerobic digestion.Microb Biotechnol. 2013 Jul;6(4):414-24. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12025. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Microb Biotechnol. 2013. PMID: 23302421 Free PMC article.
-
Microbial rRNA gene expression and co-occurrence profiles associate with biokinetics and elemental composition in full-scale anaerobic digesters.Microb Biotechnol. 2018 Jul;11(4):694-709. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13264. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Microb Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 29633555 Free PMC article.
-
The active microbial community more accurately reflects the anaerobic digestion process: 16S rRNA (gene) sequencing as a predictive tool.Microbiome. 2018 Apr 2;6(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0449-9. Microbiome. 2018. PMID: 29609653 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiomes of biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of industrial wastes: current trends, advanced tools and future outlook.Bioresour Bioprocess. 2022 Mar 5;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40643-022-00504-8. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2022. PMID: 38647867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Succession from acetoclastic to hydrogenotrophic microbial community during sewage sludge anaerobic digestion for bioenergy production.Biotechnol Lett. 2024 Dec;46(6):997-1011. doi: 10.1007/s10529-024-03528-6. Epub 2024 Sep 11. Biotechnol Lett. 2024. PMID: 39261355
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources