Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii26-33.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013110.

Effects of the 2003 advertising/promotion ban in the United Kingdom on awareness of tobacco marketing: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effects of the 2003 advertising/promotion ban in the United Kingdom on awareness of tobacco marketing: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

F Harris et al. Tob Control. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In February 2003, a comprehensive ban on tobacco promotion came into effect in the United Kingdom, which prohibited tobacco marketing through print and broadcast media, billboards, the internet, direct mail, product placement, promotions, free gifts, coupons and sponsorships.

Objective: To investigate the impact of the UK's comprehensive ban on tobacco promotion on adult smokers' awareness of tobacco marketing in the UK relative to Canada, the United States and Australia.

Design: A total of 6762 adult smokers participated in two waves of a random digit dialled telephone survey across the four countries. Wave 1 was conducted before the UK ban (October-December 2002) and Wave 2 was conducted after the UK ban (May-September 2003).

Key measures: Awareness of a range of forms of tobacco marketing.

Results: Levels of tobacco promotion awareness declined significantly among smokers in the UK after implementation of the advertising ban. Declines in awareness were greater in those channels regulated by the new law and change in awareness of tobacco promotions was much greater in the UK than the other three countries not affected by the ban. At least in the short term, there was no evidence that the law resulted in greater exposure to tobacco promotions in the few media channels not covered by the law. Notwithstanding the apparent success of the UK advertising ban and the controls in other countries, 9-22% of smokers in the four countries still reported noticing things that promoted smoking "often or very often" at Wave 2.

Conclusions: The UK policy to ban tobacco advertising and promotion has significantly reduced exposure to pro-tobacco marketing influences. These findings support the effectiveness of comprehensive bans on advertising and promotion, as included in the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest statement: There are no competing interests to declare.

References

    1. Economics, Operational Research Division (EORD), Department of Health (UK) Effect of tobacco advertising on tobacco sponsorship: a discussion document reviewing the evidence. London: Department of Health, 1992, (Smee report)
    1. United Kingdom Department of Health Social Security (UKDHHS) Effect of tobacco advertising on tobacco consumption. London: HMSO, 1992
    1. Saffer H, Chaloupka F. The effect of tobacco advertising on tobacco consumption. J of Health Econ 2000191117–1137. - PubMed
    1. MacFadyen L, Hastings G, MacKintosh A. Cross sectional study of young people's awareness of and involvement with tobacco marketing. BMJ 2001322513–517. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aitken P P, Eadie D R, Hastings G B.et al Predisposing effects of cigarette advertising on children's intentions to smoke when older. Br J Addiction 199186383–390. - PubMed

Publication types