Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii42-50.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.012492.

Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

R Borland et al. Tob Control. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To report on prevalence, trends and determinants of smoke-free home policies in smokers' homes in different countries and to estimate the effects of these policies on smoking cessation.

Design: Two waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey (ITC-4), a cohort survey of smokers conducted by telephone. Wave 1 was conducted in October/December 2002 with broadly representative samples of over 2000 adult (>or= 18 years) cigarette smokers in each of the following four countries: Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, 75% of whom were followed up at Wave 2 on average seven months later.

Key measures: Levels of smoking restrictions in homes (both waves).

Results: Australian smokers were most likely to live in smoke-free homes and UK smokers least likely (34% v 15% at Wave 1). Levels of smoke-free homes increased between waves. Logistic regressions indicated that the main independent predictors of smokers reporting smoke-free homes or implementation of a smoke-free policy between waves included household factors such as having a child, particularly a young child, and having other non-smoking adults in the household. Positive attitudes to smoke-free public places and/or reported presence of smoke-free public places were independent predictors of having or implementing smoke-free homes, supporting a social diffusion model for smoking restrictions. Intentions to quit at Wave 1 and quitting activity between survey waves were associated with implementing bans between Waves 1 and 2. Presence of bans at Wave 1 was associated with significantly greater proportions of quit attempts, and success among those who tried at Wave 2. There was no significant interaction between the predictive models and country.

Conclusions: Smoke-free public places seem to stimulate adoption of smoke-free homes, a strategy associated with both increased frequency of quit attempts, and of the success of those attempts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest

References

    1. Gerlach K K, Shopland D R, Hartman A M.et al Workplace smoking policies in the United States: results from a national survey of more than 100,000 workers. Tob Control 19976199–206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borland R, Davey C. Impact of smoke‐free bans and restrictions. In: Boyle P, Gray N, Henningfield J, Seffrin J, Zatonski W, eds. Tobacco—science, policy and public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004708–732.
    1. Borland R, Yong H‐H, Siahpush M.et al Support for and reported compliance with smoke‐free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 200615(suppl III)iii34–iii41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashley M J, Cohen J, Ferrence R.et al Smoking in the home: changing attitudes and current practices. Am J Public Health 199888797–800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borland R, Mullins R, Trotter L.et al Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home. Tob Control 19998266–271. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances