Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jun;15(6):752-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1005-4. Epub 2006 Apr 22.

Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques

Torsten Kluba  1 , Jürgen Schäfer, Tobias Hahnfeldt, Thomas Niemeyer
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques

Torsten Kluba et al. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Problem: The purpose of the investigation was a comparison of two different digital X-ray techniques with conventional standing full spine films. Evaluation of dose area product, image quality and inter-observer error of Cobb-angle measurement in patients with scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis were studied.

Methods: A consecutive series of 150 patients were prospectively randomized into three groups. Patients in group 1 (n=53) received a conventional standing postero-anterior full spine radiograph. All films were evaluated on the light box. Patients in group 2 (n=48) received a X-ray using the digital storage phosphor plate system (CR). For group 3 (n=49) digital pulsed fluoroscopy was used. In groups 2 and 3 images were exported to a picture archiving and communicating system (PACS) workstation and viewed on a monitor (Siemens SMM 21140P, Germany). Dose area product measurements were performed in all three groups (Diamentor-M, PTW, Freiburg). Three experienced investigators independently reviewed all pictures. Pedicles and endplates were counted. Cobb-angles of the main curves were measured.

Results: The mean dose area product was 97.0 cGy cm(2) (37.0-380.0 cGy cm(2)) for conventional films, 31.5 cGy cm(2) (6.0-66.0 cGy cm(2)) for CR imaging and 5.0 cGy cm(2) (1.0-29.0 cGy cm(2)) for digital fluoroscopy. The differences of Cobb-angle measurements were not significantly different for the three methods. Differences in the count of pedicles and endplates between the investigators were significantly lower for the conventional film as an indicator for the best detail presentation.

Conclusion: A significant reduction in dose area product is possible with modern digital X-ray methods. The inter-observer error of Cobb-angle measurement is not significantly altered. The detail information is decreased in comparison to conventional films.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standard full spine film (a), CR imaging (b) and digital fluoroscopy (c)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiation exposure described as area product value
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurements of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs: intraobserver and interoberserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72:328–333. - PubMed
    1. Geijer H, Beckmann KW, Jonsson B, Andersson T, Persliden J. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation. Radiology. 2001;218:402–410. - PubMed
    1. Geijer H, Verdonck B, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:543–551. - PubMed
    1. Gross C, Gross M, Kuschner S. Error analysis of scoliosis curvature measurement. Bull Hosp Joint Dis Orthop Inst. 1983;43:171–177. - PubMed
    1. Hellström G, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Reduction of radiation dose in radiologic examination of patients with scoliosis. Spine. 1983;8:28–30. - PubMed

Publication types