Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;24(2):198-201.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0099-6. Epub 2006 May 16.

Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study

Affiliations

Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study

Ketan K Badani et al. World J Urol. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the treatment of choice for staghorn renal calculi. Many reports suggest that laparoscopy can be an alternative treatment for large renal stones. We wished to evaluate the role and feasibility of laparoscopic extended pyelolithotomy (REP) for treatment of staghorn calculi. Thirteen patients underwent REP for treatment of staghorn calculi over a 12-day period. Twelve patients had partial staghorn stones and one had a complete staghorn stone. All patients had pre-operative and post-operative imaging including KUB and computed tomography. All procedures were completed robotically without conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery. Mean operative time was 158 min and mean robotic console time was 108 min. Complete stone removal was accomplished in all patients except the one with a complete staghorn calculus. Estimated blood loss was 100 cc, and no patient required post-operative transfusion. REP is an effective treatment alternative to PCNL in some patients with staghorn calculi. However, patients with complete staghorn stones are not suitable candidates for this particular technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Urology. 2002 Sep;60(3):509-13 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2005 Dec;96(9):1365-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):691-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1378-80 - PubMed
    1. J Endourol. 2005 May;19(4):441-5; discussion 445 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources