Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006:2:2006.0029.
doi: 10.1038/msb4100067. Epub 2006 Jun 6.

Adaptively inferring human transcriptional subnetworks

Affiliations

Adaptively inferring human transcriptional subnetworks

Debopriya Das et al. Mol Syst Biol. 2006.

Abstract

Although the human genome has been sequenced, progress in understanding gene regulation in humans has been particularly slow. Many computational approaches developed for lower eukaryotes to identify cis-regulatory elements and their associated target genes often do not generalize to mammals, largely due to the degenerate and interactive nature of such elements. Motivated by the switch-like behavior of transcriptional responses, we present a systematic approach that allows adaptive determination of active transcriptional subnetworks (cis-motif combinations, the direct target genes and physiological processes regulated by the corresponding transcription factors) from microarray data in mammals, with accuracy similar to that achieved in lower eukaryotes. Our analysis uncovered several new subnetworks active in human liver and in cell-cycle regulation, with similar functional characteristics as the known ones. We present biochemical evidence for our predictions, and show that the recently discovered G2/M-specific E2F pathway is wider than previously thought; in particular, E2F directly activates certain mitotic genes involved in hepatocellular carcinomas. Additionally, we demonstrate that this method can predict subnetworks in a condition-specific manner, as well as regulatory crosstalk across multiple tissues. Our approach allows systematic understanding of how phenotypic complexity is regulated at the transcription level in mammals and offers marked advantage in systems where little or no prior knowledge of transcriptional regulation is available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modeling mammalian transcription with linear splines. (A) Sigmoidal transcriptional response (Carey, 1998). The response is flat below a binding affinity threshold, namely, the gene activation threshold, and varies exponentially above it. It saturates at high binding energies. (B) Example of a linear spline. A linear spline is a piecewise linear function: it is zero below (above) a threshold, termed knot (ξ), and changes linearly above (below) it. Eg refers to the observed mRNA level of gene g, whereas EgC is its mRNA level in the reference sample. Knots are related to gene activation thresholds. All genes with PWM scores Sg>ξ are predicted targets of the motif contributing to this spline, shaded in blue. (C) A schematic view of the key steps in identification of significant motifs and motif pairs using linear splines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of our analysis. A snapshot of the tissue-specific transcriptional subnetworks discovered from microarray data on adult human liver under a normal condition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biochemical validation of target genes. Results of RT–PCR analysis in NIH3T3 fibroblasts expressing an inducible ERE2F1 or a transactivation-deficient mutant, MERE2F1. At time zero, medium containing 500 nM of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT) was added and transcript levels of (A) DLG7 and (B) CDC16 were determined using gene-specific primers at the indicated times by RT–PCR. The respective transcript levels with 10 μg/ml of cyclohexamide (CTX) added are shown in (C) DLG7 and (D) CDC16. GAPDH was used as a standardization control. Plotted data reflect results after normalization with GAPDH.

Comment in

  • Promoting human promoters.
    Furman I, Pilpel Y. Furman I, et al. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0030. doi: 10.1038/msb4100072. Epub 2006 Jun 6. Mol Syst Biol. 2006. PMID: 16760901 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basso K, Margolin AA, Stolovitzky G, Klein U, Dalla-Favera R, Califano A (2005) Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat Genet 37: 382–390 - PubMed
    1. Berg OG, von Hippel PH (1987) Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical–mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. J Mol Biol 193: 723–750 - PubMed
    1. Bussemaker HJ, Li H, Siggia ED (2001) Regulatory element detection using correlation with expression. Nat Genet 27: 167–171 - PubMed
    1. Carey M (1998) The enhanceosome and transcriptional synergy. Cell 92: 5–8 - PubMed
    1. Chen KY (1997) Transcription factors and the down-regulation of G1/S boundary genes in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence. Front Biosci 2: d417–d426 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms