Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;41(6):510-5.
doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000209662.24569.c7.

Accuracy of attenuation measurement of vascular wall in vitro on computed tomography angiography: Effect of wall thickness, density of contrast medium, and measurement point

Affiliations

Accuracy of attenuation measurement of vascular wall in vitro on computed tomography angiography: Effect of wall thickness, density of contrast medium, and measurement point

Shigeru Suzuki et al. Invest Radiol. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to assess the effects of measurement point, wall thickness, and intravascular density of contrast material on attenuation measurement of vascular wall.

Materials and methods: We used vascular models (actual attenuation value of the wall: 83 HU) with wall thicknesses of 1.5, 1.0, or 0.5 mm, filled with contrast material of 254, 325, or 400 HU. The 9 vascular models were fixed in an oil-filled container and scanned with a 16-detector computed tomography. The wall attenuation values were measured at 1 point for 0.5-mm thickness models, 3 for 1.0-mm thickness models, and 5 for 1.5-mm thickness models with the same interval of 0.25 mm. Total 20 measurements were done for each point.

Results: For 1.0-mm and 1.5-mm thickness models, wall attenuation progressively increased as the measurement points approached the lumen (P < 0.0001). At all the measurement points for 0.5-mm and 1.0-mm thickness models and the 2 inner measurement points for 1.5-mm thickness models, the densities of contrast material affected the wall attenuations significantly (P < 0.0001). At the midportion for 1.5-mm thickness models, the wall attenuations were not affected by the densities of the contrast material (P = 0.6301), and were 65-68 HU.

Conclusions: The effects of the intravascular density of contrast material, measurement point, and wall thickness should be considered in the attenuation measurement of the wall.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources