Limitations of enzyme replacement therapy: current and future

Abstract

Orphan drug legislation passed in the USA in 1983 and in Europe in 1999 has encouraged biotechnology companies to develop treatments for diseases that the industry previously ignored because they affect only small numbers of people and promised only limited profitability. Incentives, exclusivity and the freedom to charge sufficient to cover development costs has led to a niche market, and patients with lysosomal storage disorders have been one of the main beneficiaries of these developments. The recombinant production of highly purified enzymes that are modified to improve tissue targeting has been a direct result of this legislation. The spectacular clinical and financial success of Cerezyme (and previously Ceredase, Genzyme) for the treatment of Gaucher disease has led to the development of enzyme replacement treatment(s) for Fabry disease and mucopolysaccharidoses types I and VI. A number of other enzyme replacement therapies are at an earlier stage in development and the next 12 months could see the launch of therapies for mucopolysaccharidosis type II and Pompe disease. Like all medical treatments, this approach has some limitations. Not all patients are suitable for treatment, some organs and tissues are corrected more readily than others, and there are problems with gauging efficacy in these highly variable disorders. Finally, the therapies are expensive, limiting access to patients from those countries that are able to afford expensive health care.