Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Dec;16(8):601-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Jun 12.

The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures

Thomas J Carmody  1 , A John Rush, Ira Bernstein, Diane Warden, Stephen Brannan, Daniel Burnham, Ada Woo, Madhukar H Trivedi
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures

Thomas J Carmody et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

The 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD(17)) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) are two widely used clinician-rated symptom scales. A 6-item version of the HRSD (HRSD(6)) was created by Bech to address the psychometric limitations of the HRSD(17). The psychometric properties of these measures were compared using classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) methods. IRT methods were used to equate total scores on any two scales. Data from two distinctly different outpatient studies of nonpsychotic major depression: a 12-month study of highly treatment-resistant patients (n=233) and an 8-week acute phase drug treatment trial (n=985) were used for robustness of results. MADRS and HRSD(6) items generally contributed more to the measurement of depression than HRSD(17) items as shown by higher item-total correlations and higher IRT slope parameters. The MADRS and HRSD(6) were unifactorial while the HRSD(17) contained 2 factors. The MADRS showed about twice the precision in estimating depression as either the HRSD(17) or HRSD(6) for average severity of depression. An HRSD(17) of 7 corresponded to an 8 or 9 on the MADRS and 4 on the HRSD(6). The MADRS would be superior to the HRSD(17) in the conduct of clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Test Information Functions for Study 1 (n=233)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Test Information Functions for Study 2 (n=985)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, Text Revision American Psychiatric Press; Washington DC: 2000.
    1. Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, Marshall MB. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight? Am. J. Psychiatry. 2004;161(12):2163–2177. - PubMed
    1. Bech P, Allerup P, Gram LF, Reisby N, Rosenberg R, Jacobsen O, Nagy A. The Hamilton Depression Scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1981;63:290–299. - PubMed
    1. Bech P, Allerup P, Maier W, Albus M, Lavori P, Ayuso JL. The Hamilton scales and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90). A cross-national validity study in patients with panic disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1992;160:206–211. - PubMed
    1. Bech P, Allerup P, Reisby N, Gram LF. Assessment of symptom change from improvement curves on the Hamilton depression scale in trials with antidepressants. Psychopharmacology. 1984;84:276–281. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances