Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004:4:e20.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.95. Epub 2004 Mar 1.

Economic evaluation of integrated care: an introduction

Affiliations

Economic evaluation of integrated care: an introduction

Hindrik Vondeling. Int J Integr Care. 2004.

Abstract

Background: Integrated care has emerged in a variety of forms in industrialised countries during the past decade. It is generally assumed that these new arrangements result in increased effectiveness and quality of care, while being cost-effective or even cost-saving at the same time. However, systematic evaluation, including an evaluation of the relative costs and benefits of these arrangements, has largely been lacking.

Objectives: To stimulate fruitful dialogue and debate about the need for economic evaluation in integrated care, and to outline possibilities for undertaking economic appraisal studies in this relatively new field.

Theory: Key concepts, including e.g. scarcity and opportunity costs, are introduced, followed by a brief overview of the most common methods used in economic evaluation of health care programmes. Then a number of issues that seem particularly relevant for economic evaluation of integrated care arrangements are addressed in more detail, illustrated with examples from the literature.

Conclusion and discussion: There is a need for well-designed economic evaluation studies of integrated care arrangements, in particular in order to support decision making on the long-term financing of these programmes. Although relatively few studies have been done to date, the field is challenging from a methodological point of view, offering analysts a wealth of opportunities. Guidance to realise these opportunities is provided by the general principles for economic evaluation, which can be tailored to the requirements of this particular field.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications and implications: a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2002 Nov 14;:2. Available from: URL: www.ijic.org. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardy B, Van Raak A, Mur-Veeman I, Steenbergen M, Paulus A. Introduction. In: van Raak A, Mur-Veeman I, Hardy B, Steenbergen M, Paulus A, editors. Integrated care in Europe. Description and comparison of integrated care in six EU countries. The Netherlands: Elsevier Gezondheidzorg, Maarssen; 2003. pp. 9–13.
    1. Van der Linden BA, Rosendal H. The birth of transmural care in the 1990s. In: Van Rooij E, Droyan Kodner L, Rijsemus T, Schrijvers G, editors. Health and health care in the Netherlands. A critical self-assessment of Dutch experts in medical and health sciences. The Netherlands: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, Maarssen; 2002. pp. 191–7.
    1. Rosendal H. Comparative cohort studies in transmural care. Three cases of structurally embedded practice in the Netherlands. The Netherlands: Ridderprint Offset Drukkerij BV, Ridderkerk; 2002. (PhD thesis)
    1. Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. Needs investment and cultural change [editorial] British Medical Journal. 1995;311:1447–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources