Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun 22;273(1593):1449-54.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3486.

Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection

Affiliations

Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection

Philip D McLoughlin et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Individuals are predicted to maximize lifetime reproductive success (LRS) through selective use of resources; however, a wide range of ecological and social processes may prevent individuals from always using the highest-quality resources available. Resource selection functions (RSFs) estimate the relative amount of time an individual spends using a resource as a function of the proportional availability of that resource. We quantified the association between LRS and coefficients of individual-based RSFs describing lifetime resource selection for 267 female red deer (Cervus elaphus) of the Isle of Rum, Scotland, from 1970 to 2001. LRS was significantly related to first- and second-order effects of selection for Agrostis/Festuca grassland and proximity to the sea coast (quality of forage within Agrostis/Festuca grassland was highest nearest the coast (ratio of short:long grassland)). The benefits of selecting for quality in Agrostis/Festuca grassland, however, traded-off with increases in LRS gained by avoiding conspecific density. LRS was inversely associated with local density, which was highest along the coast, and reproductive benefits of selecting Agrostis/Festuca grassland diminished with increasing density. We discuss the relevance of these results to our understanding of the spatial distribution of red deer abundance, and potential applications of our approach to evolutionary and applied ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of LRS (1.46±1.35 (mean±s.d.)) for 267 hinds living to at least age 3, Isle of Rum, Scotland, 1970–2001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted response in LRS (resampled means) with changes in βAgrostis/Festuca (encompassing the mean and approximately 1 s.d. of observed values) and three levels of local density, holding all other β coefficients constant at population mean values except βdistcoast2. Levels of local density include the population mean±1 s.d. (a) 47.0 hinds, (b) 72.3 hinds (mean), (c) 97.6 hinds. We varied βdistcoast2 as the observed mean in βdistcoast2 for hinds having centroids of movement less than 1 km from the coast (solid circles) and greater than 1 km from the coast (open circles).

References

    1. Akçakaya H.R. Viability analyses with habitat-based metapopulation models. Popul. Ecol. 2000;42:45–53. doi:10.1007/s101440050008 - DOI
    1. Boyce M.S, Vernier P.R, Nielsen S.E, Schmiegelow F.K.A. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 2002;157:281–300. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 - DOI
    1. Brommer J.E, Gustafsson L, Pietiainen H, Merilä J. Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution. Am. Nat. 2004;163:505–517. doi:10.1086/382547 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burnham K.P, Anderson D.R. 2nd edn. Springer; New York, NY: 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
    1. Clutton-Brock T.H, Albon S.D, Guinness F.E. University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL: 1982. Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources