Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005:2005:864-8.

Alignment of multiple ontologies of anatomy: deriving indirect mappings from direct mappings to a reference

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Alignment of multiple ontologies of anatomy: deriving indirect mappings from direct mappings to a reference

Songmao Zhang et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the indirect alignment of two anatomical ontologies through a reference ontology and to compare it to direct alignment between these two ontologies. The ontologies under investigation are the Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary (MA) and the NCI Thesaurus (NCI). The Foundational Model of Anatomy serves as reference ontology.

Methods: The direct alignment employs a combination of lexical and structural similarity. The indirect alignment simply derives mappings from direct alignments to the reference ontology.

Results: The indirect MA-NCI alignment yielded 703 mappings and the direct alignment 715, 654 of which are common to both. The mappings specific to one approach were analyzed.

Conclusions: When a reference ontology exists, indirect alignment of multiple ontologies through a reference represents a valid, cost-effective alternative to pairwise alignment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aligning multiple ontologies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Direct vs. indirect alignment
Figure 3a
Figure 3a
Indirect MA-NCI alignment through FMA
Figure 3b
Figure 3b
Direct vs. indirect alignment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Uschold M, Gruninger M. Creating semantically integrated communities on the world wide web. Proc. International Workshop on the Semantic Web 2002 http://semanticweb2002.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/USCHOLD-Hawaii-InvitedTalk2...
    1. Rector AL, Bechhofer S, Goble CA, Horrocks I, Now-lan WA, Solomon WD. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artif Intell Med. 1997;9(2):139–71. - PubMed
    1. Noy NF. Tools for mapping and merging ontologies. In: Staab S, Studer R, editors. Handbook on Ontologies: Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 365–384
    1. Hayamizu T, Mangan M, Corradi J, Kadin J, Ringwald M. The Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary: a tool for annotating and integrating data. Genome Biology. 2005;6(3):R29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Coronado S, Haber MW, Sioutos N, Tuttle MS, Wright LW. NCI Thesaurus: Using Science-based Terminology to Integrate Cancer Research Results. Medinfo. 2004;2004:33–7. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources