Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;132(6):617-23.
doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.6.617.

Ceravital reconstruction of canal wall down mastoidectomy: long-term results

Affiliations

Ceravital reconstruction of canal wall down mastoidectomy: long-term results

Charles C Della Santina et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To describe long-term outcomes of external auditory canal wall reconstruction using bioactive glass ceramic (Ceravital) after canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Design: Retrospective review of a case series over a 21-year period, with a mean +/- SD follow-up of 13.1 +/- 6.7 years (range, 0.2-20.5 years).

Setting: Private otologic practice.

Patients: The study population comprised 20 consecutive patients aged 12 to 60 years, who had previously undergone canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Intervention: Reconstruction of the canal wall with bioactive glass ceramic.

Main outcome measures: Incidence, cause, and timing of reconstruction failure; need for additional surgery; change in hearing; frequency of outpatient visits; and incidence of surgical complications.

Results: Prosthetic walls have remained intact in 16 patients followed for more than 5 years. One had remained intact at 3 months after surgery, but the patient was lost to follow-up. Prosthesis removal was required in 3 patients (because of infection, displacement, and cholesteatoma in 1 patient each). The only perioperative complications were otorrhea in 4 patients and a 5-dB sensorineural hearing loss in 1 patient. Of the 16 intact patients with long-term follow-up, 4 required no further surgery, while 11 underwent an average of 2 subsequent middle ear procedures each (range, 1-3), including 4 planned reexplorations. The mean +/- SD air bone gap improved 11 +/- 16 dB as of the most recent audiogram (mean +/- SD, 7.7 +/- 5.8 years after operation).

Conclusion: Canal wall reconstruction using bioactive glass ceramic is a useful option for patients who desire freedom from the frequent mastoid bowl debridements and activity restrictions that may result from canal wall down mastoidectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances