Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr-Jun;41(2):207-15.

Issues in estimating risks and rates in sports injury research

Sarah B Knowles  1 , Stephen W Marshall, Kevin M Guskiewicz
Affiliations

Issues in estimating risks and rates in sports injury research

Sarah B Knowles et al. J Athl Train. 2006 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To describe 3 measures of incidence used in sports injury epidemiology.

Background: To promote safety in sports, athletic trainers must be able to accurately interpret and apply injury data and statistics. Doing so allows them to more efficiently articulate this information to school administrators in recommending increases in medical resources, such as more personnel, better services, and safer facilities and equipment.

Description: Using data from a study of high school sports injuries, we review incidence rates, epidemiologic incidence proportions, and clinical incidence. The incidence rate is the number of injuries divided by the number of athlete-exposures and is based on the epidemiologic concept of person-time at risk. It accounts for variation in exposure between athletes and teams and is widely used by researchers. The epidemiologic incidence proportion is the number of injured athletes divided by the number of athletes at risk. It is a valid estimator of average injury risk, yet it is rarely used in sports injury epidemiology to communicate information about such risks to nonscientists. Clinical incidence is a hybrid between the epidemiologic incidence proportion and the incidence rate in that it uses the number of injuries in the numerator but the number of athletes at risk in the denominator. It has been widely used in research on high school football injury but is neither a valid estimator of risk nor a true rate.

Advantages: Athletic trainers who understand the causes of and risk factors for sport-related injury are better positioned to make safe return-to-play decisions and decrease the likelihood of reinjury in athletes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Incidence of injury on 1 high school football team during 1 season. *Athlete-exposure is defined as 1 athlete participating in 1 game or practice
Figure 2
Figure 2. Incidence of injury on 1 high school volleyball team during 1 season. *Athlete-exposure is defined as 1 athlete participating in 1 game or practice
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Measures of disease frequency. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998:29–46 .
    1. Weaver NL, Mueller FO, Kalsbeek WD, Bowling JM. The North Carolina high school athletic injury study: design and methodology. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:176–182. - PubMed
    1. Schulz MR, Marshall SW, Yang J, Mueller FO, Weaver NL, Bowling JM. A prospective cohort study of injury incidence and risk factors in North Carolina high school competitive cheerleaders. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:396–405. - PubMed
    1. Yang J, Bowling JM, Lewis MA, Marshall SW, Runyan CW, Mueller FO. Use of discretionary protective equipment in high school athletes: prevalence and determinants. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1996–2002. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang J, Marshall SW, Bowling JM, Runyan CW, Mueller FO, Lewis MA. Use of discretionary protective equipment and rate of lower extremity injury in high school athletes. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:511–519. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources