Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun 22:6:165.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-165.

Impact of funding on biomedical research: a retrospective cohort study

Evelyne Decullier  1 , François Chapuis
Affiliations

Impact of funding on biomedical research: a retrospective cohort study

Evelyne Decullier et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Public funding is aimed at facilitating the initiation, completion and publication of research study protocols. However, no evaluation is made to investigate the impact of grant success on the conduct of biomedical research. It is therefore of great interest to compare the fate of funded protocols versus not funded: Are they initiated? Are they completed? Did the results confirm the hypothesis? Were they published? The objective was to investigate the fate of protocols submitted for funding, whether they were funded or not.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of protocols submitted for funding to the Greater Lyon regional scientific committee in 1997. Initial characteristics of protocols (design, study size, investigator status) were abstracted from archives, and follow-up characteristics (initiation, completion and publication) from a mailed questionnaire to the principal investigators.

Results: Among the 142 submitted protocols, follow-up information was available for 114 (80%). As a whole, 38% of studies were funded by the Greater Lyon research committee. The rate of initiation varied from 62% for studies with no acknowledged funding to 100% for studies with both committee and other simultaneous funding. When initiated, the rate of completion was 62% for studies with at least one funding and 40% for studies without acknowledged funding. When completed, publication was reached for 77% of studies with either committee or external funding, for 58% of studies without acknowledged funding and for 37% of studies with both committee and external funding.

Conclusion: Some protocols submitted for funding were initiated and completed without any funding declared. To our understanding this mean that not all protocols submitted really needed funding and also that health care facilities are unaware that they implicitly financially support and pay for biomedical research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fate of protocols submitted to a regional scientific committee.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Moses H, Dorsey ER, Matheson DH, Thier SO. Financial anatomy of biomedical research. Jama. 2005;294:1333–1342. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1333. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandel HG, Vesell ES. From progress to regression: biomedical research funding. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:872–876. doi: 10.1172/JCI200423245. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Recherche et développement en France- Résultats 2000, estimations 2001, objectifs socio-économiques du BCRD en 2002. Les dossiers- N°144. Vol. 144. Ministère de l'éducation nationale, de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche- Paris, France; 2003. http://cisad.adc.education.fr/reperes/public/publicat/res/res00/default.htm
    1. Recherche et développement en France- Résultats 2001, estimations 2002, objectifs socio-économiques du BCRD en 2003. Les dossiers- N°148. Vol. 148. Ministère de l'éducation nationale, de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche- Paris, France; 2004. http://cisad.adc.education.fr/reperes/public/publicat/res/res01/default.htm
    1. Recherche et développement en France- Résultats 2002, estimations 2003, objectifs socio-économiques du BCRD en 2004. Les dossiers- N°162. Vol. 162. Ministère de l'éducation nationale, de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche-Paris, France; 2005. http://cisad.adc.education.fr/reperes/public/publicat/res/res02/default.htm

Publication types