Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):19.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38874.499167.7C. Epub 2006 Jun 22.

Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study

Mala Rao  1 , Aileen Clarke, Colin Sanderson, Richard Hammersley
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study

Mala Rao et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relation between older patients' assessments of the quality of their primary care and measures of good clinical practice on the basis of data from administrative and clinical records.

Design: Cross sectional population based study using the general practice assessment survey.

Setting: 18 general practices in the Basildon primary care trust area, south east England.

Participants: 3487 people aged 65 or more.

Main outcome measures: Correlations between mean practice scores on the general practice assessment survey and three evidence based measures on survey of case records (monitoring for, and control of, hypertension, and vaccination against influenza).

Results: 76% of people (3487/4563) responded to the general practice assessment survey. Correlations between patient assessed survey scores for technical quality and the objective records based measures of good clinical practice were 0.22 (95% confidence interval -0.28 to 0.62) for hypertension monitored, 0.30 (-0.19 to 0.67) for hypertension controlled, and -0.05 (-0.50 to 0.43) for influenza vaccination.

Conclusions: Older patients' assessments are not a sufficient basis for assessing the technical quality of their primary care. For an overall assessment both patient based and records based measures are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatter plots for general practice assessment survey scores for technical quality compared with three records based measures. Size of marker indicates confidence interval around survey score estimate
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Donabedian A. Exploration in quality assessment and monitoring. Vol I. Definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press, 1980.
    1. Maxwell RJ. Quality assessment in health. BMJ 1984;288: 1470-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med 1996;335: 966-1001. - PubMed
    1. Shickle D. Public preferences for health care: prioritisation in the United Kingdom Bioethics 1997;11: 277-90. - PubMed
    1. Rhodes P, Nocon A. User involvement and the NHS reforms. Health Expect 1998;1: 73-81. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types