Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jun;29(6):237-42.
doi: 10.1002/clc.4960290603.

Implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices--Part II: implantable cardioverter defibrillators and implantable loop recorders

Affiliations
Review

Implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices--Part II: implantable cardioverter defibrillators and implantable loop recorders

Fred Kusumoto et al. Clin Cardiol. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Implantable cardiac devices have become firmly entrenched as important therapeutic tools for a variety of cardiac conditions. The second part of this two-part review discusses the contemporary use and follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and the implantable loop recorder. The ICD has become the standard therapy for protecting patients against sudden cardiac death. Two recent trials, the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial II (MADIT II) and the Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HEFT), demonstrated that the ICD is associated with a significant survival benefit for patients with reduced ejection fraction (< 0.30-0.35), particularly if heart failure symptoms are present. The ICD has an important role in the management of other conditions associated with a high risk for sudden death, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, long QT syndrome, and Brugada syndrome. The implantable loop recorder has become an important diagnostic tool for the patient with unexplained syncope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AVID Investigators : A comparison of antiarrhythmic‐drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near‐fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1576–1583 - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, Dorian P, Roy D, Sheldon RS, Mitchell LB, Green MS, Klein GJ, O'Brien B: Canadian Implantable Defibrillator study (CIDS): A randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Circulation 2000; 101: 1297–1301 - PubMed
    1. Wyse GD, Friedman PL, Brodsky MA, Beckman KJ, Carlson MD, Curtis AB, Hallstrom AP, Raitt MA, Wilkoff BL, Greene HL, for the AVID Investigators : Life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmias due to transient or correctable causes: High risk for death in follow‐up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1718–1724 - PubMed
    1. Ehlert FA, Cannom DS, Renfroe EG: Comparison of dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease in patients with life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmias: Differences in presentation and outcome in the AVID registry. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 816–822 - PubMed
    1. Buxton AE, Lee KL, DiCarlo L, Gold MR, Greer GS, Prystowsky EN, O'Toole MF, Tang A, Fisher JD, Coromilas J, Talajic M, Hafley G, for the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators : Electrophysiology testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1937–1945 - PubMed

MeSH terms