How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania
- PMID: 16796749
- PMCID: PMC1557863
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-22
How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania
Abstract
Background: Antenatal care (ANC) is a widely used strategy to improve the health of pregnant women and to encourage skilled care during childbirth. In 2002, the Ministry of Health of the United Republic of Tanzania developed a national adaptation plan based on the new model of the World Health Organisation (WHO). In this study we assess the time health workers currently spent on providing ANC services and compare it to the requirements anticipated for the new ANC model in order to identify the implications of Focused ANC on health care providers' workload.
Methods: Health workers in four dispensaries in Mtwara Urban District, Southern Tanzania, were observed while providing routine ANC. The time used for the overall activity as well as for the different, specific components of 71 ANC service provisions was measured in detail; 28 of these were first visits and 43 revisits. Standard time requirements for the provision of focused ANC were assessed through simulated consultations based on the new guidelines.
Results: The average time health workers currently spend for providing ANC service to a first visit client was found to be 15 minutes; the provision of ANC according to the focused ANC model was assessed to be 46 minutes. For a revisiting client the difference between current practise and the anticipated standard of the new model was 27 minutes (9 vs. 36 min.). The major discrepancy between the two procedures was related to counselling. On average a first visit client was counselled for 1:30 minutes, while counselling in revisiting clients did hardly take place at all. The simulation of focused ANC revealed that proper counselling would take about 15 minutes per visit.
Conclusion: While the introduction of focused ANC has the potential to improve the health of pregnant women and to raise the number of births attended by skilled staff in Tanzania, it may need additional investment in human resources. The generally anticipated saving effect of the new model through the reduction of routine consultations may not materialise because the number of consultations is already low in Tanzania with a median of only 4 visits per pregnancy. Special attention needs to be given to counselling attitudes and skills during the training for Focused ANC as this component is identified as the major difference between old practise and the new model. Our estimated requirement of 46 minutes per first visit consultation matches well with the WHO estimate of 40 minutes.
Similar articles
-
Provision of inadequate information on postnatal care and services during antenatal visits in Busega, Northwest Tanzania: a simulated client study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 25;22(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08071-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35614457 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of national antenatal care guidelines and provider training on obstetric danger sign counselling: a propensity score matching analysis of the 2014 Ethiopia service provision assessment plus survey.Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01442-6. Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 35668529 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative exploration of health workers' and clients' perceptions of barriers to completing four antenatal care visits in Morogoro Region, Tanzania.Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw034. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Health Policy Plan. 2016. PMID: 27117481
-
Efficiency of antenatal care and childbirth services in selected primary health care facilities in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 28;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-96. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 24581003 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing standard antenatal care interventions: health system cost at primary health facilities in Tanzania.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Dec 7;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00325-0. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021. PMID: 34876154 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Antenatal care in practice: an exploratory study in antenatal care clinics in the Kilombero Valley, south-eastern Tanzania.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 May 20;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-36. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011. PMID: 21599900 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 8;17(Suppl 2):336. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1493-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 29143624 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of nutrition behavior change communication on nutrition knowledge and dietary practices of pregnant adolescents in West Arsi, Central Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 27;12:1541415. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1541415. eCollection 2025. Front Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40212716 Free PMC article.
-
Brief Report: Integration of PrEP Services Into Routine Antenatal and Postnatal Care: Experiences From an Implementation Program in Western Kenya.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 15;79(5):590-595. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001850. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018. PMID: 30204720 Free PMC article.
-
How much time is available for antenatal care consultations? Assessment of the quality of care in rural Tanzania.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Sep 24;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-64. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011. PMID: 21943347 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO The World health report 2005: Make every mother and child count. WHO, Geneva. 2005. - PubMed
-
- WHO, UNICEF Antenatal Care in Developing Countries. Promises, achievements and missed opportunities. An analysis of trends, levels and differentials, 1990–2001. WHO, Geneva. 2003.
-
- WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group WHO Antenatal Care Randomized Trial: Manual for the Implementation of the New Model. WHO, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Geneva. 2002.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources