Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jul;48(1):28-36.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.046.

Improving albumin levels among hemodialysis patients: a community-based randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving albumin levels among hemodialysis patients: a community-based randomized controlled trial

Janeen B Leon et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Low albumin level is a strong predictor of mortality and morbidity among hemodialysis patients, yet few interventions are available to improve albumin levels. Moreover, the relative importance of nutritional barriers versus inflammation in contributing to hypoalbuminemia is unclear. We sought to determine whether targeting specific nutritional barriers will improve albumin levels.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 180 patients with baseline albumin levels less than 3.7 g/dL (<37 g/L) at 44 long-term hemodialysis facilities. Study coordinators identified and intervened on specific barriers present among intervention patients, whereas control patients continued to receive the usual care. Barriers targeted included poor nutritional knowledge, poor appetite, help needed with shopping or cooking, low fluid intake, inadequate dialysis dose, depression, difficulty chewing, difficulty swallowing, gastrointestinal symptoms, and acidosis.

Results: At baseline, intervention and control patients had similar albumin levels, dietary intakes, levels of inflammatory markers, and numbers of nutritional barriers. After 12 months, intervention patients had greater increases in albumin levels compared with control patients (+0.21 versus +0.06 g/dL [+2.1 versus +0.6 g/L]; P < 0.01), as well as greater increases in energy intake (+4.1 versus -0.6 Kcal/d/kg; P < 0.001) and protein intake (+0.13 versus -0.06 g/d/kg; P < 0.001). The intervention appeared most effective for barriers related to poor nutritional knowledge, help needed with shopping or cooking, and difficulty swallowing. About half the subjects had elevated levels of inflammatory markers, but there was no relationship between change in levels of albumin and inflammatory markers.

Conclusion: A nutrition intervention tailored to patient-specific barriers resulted in modest improvements in albumin levels regardless of levels of inflammatory markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources