Noninvasive biochemical markers of liver fibrosis
- PMID: 16802010
Noninvasive biochemical markers of liver fibrosis
Abstract
The assessment of liver fibrosis provides useful information not only for diagnosis but also for therapeutic decision. Although needle biopsy of the liver is the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, it has some technical limitations and risks. This has led to the development of noninvasive biochemical markers of liver fibrosis: direct markers which reflect extracellular matrix turnover and indirect markers which reflect alterations in hepatic function. Markers associated with matrix deposition or degradation and some cytokines implied in fibrosis may be used as individual markers or as combination of markers to generate an algorithm to evaluate the stage of fibrosis. Also, fibrosis may be predicted by using indirect markers as a single routine laboratory test or multicomponent indirect fibrosis tests. Serum markers are of great value not only in patients at risk for liver biopsy, but also as a part of the assessment of patients with chronic liver disease avoiding the invasive methods.
Similar articles
-
New diagnostic method for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.Intervirology. 2008;51 Suppl 1:11-6. doi: 10.1159/000122594. Epub 2008 Jun 10. Intervirology. 2008. PMID: 18544943 Review.
-
Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review.Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1160-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30110.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15180741 Review.
-
Non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(3):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.03.002. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19505671 Review.
-
[Clinical application of non-invasive diagnosis for hepatic fibrosis].Korean J Hepatol. 2007 Jun;13(2):129-37. Korean J Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17585186 Review. Korean.
-
Assessment of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases.J Dig Dis. 2009 Feb;10(1):7-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00356.x. J Dig Dis. 2009. PMID: 19236541 Review.
Cited by
-
Liver fibrosis: a compilation on the biomarkers status and their significance during disease progression.Future Sci OA. 2017 Oct 5;4(1):FSO250. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0083. eCollection 2018 Jan. Future Sci OA. 2017. PMID: 29255622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Elucidating Potential Profibrotic Mechanisms of Emerging Biomarkers for Early Prognosis of Hepatic Fibrosis.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 3;21(13):4737. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134737. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32635162 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Serial evaluation of hepatic function profile after Fontan operation.Herz. 2014 Feb;39(1):98-104. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3811-5. Epub 2013 May 8. Herz. 2014. PMID: 23649317
-
Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update.Hepatol Int. 2017 Jan;11(1):1-30. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9760-3. Epub 2016 Oct 6. Hepatol Int. 2017. PMID: 27714681
-
Non-Celiac Wheat Gluten Sensitivity Model: Effects on Hepatic Morphophysiology of Wistar Rats.Nutrients. 2025 May 28;17(11):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu17111842. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 40507110 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical