Preconception care and treatment with assisted reproductive technologies
- PMID: 16802186
- PMCID: PMC1592158
- DOI: 10.1007/s10995-006-0094-y
Preconception care and treatment with assisted reproductive technologies
Abstract
Couples with fertility problems seeking treatment with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as in vitro fertilization should receive preconception counseling on all factors that are provided when counseling patients without fertility problems. Additional counseling should address success rates and possible risks from ART therapies. Success rates from ART are improving, with the highest live birth rates averaging about 40% per cycle among women less than 35 years old. A woman's age lowers the chance of achieving a live birth, as do smoking, obesity, and infertility diagnoses such as hydrosalpinx, uterine leiomyoma, or male factor infertility. Singletons conceived with ART may have lower birth weights. Animal studies suggest that genetic imprinting disorders may be induced by certain embryo culture conditions. The major risk from ovarian stimulation is multiple gestation. About one-third of live-birth deliveries from ART have more than one infant, and twins represent 85% of these multiple-birth children. There are more complications in multiple gestation pregnancies, infants are more likely to be born preterm and with other health problems, and families caring for multiples experience more stress. Transferring fewer embryos per cycle reduces the multiple birth rate from ART, but the patient may have to pay for additional cycles of ART because of a lower likelihood of pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014. PMID: 25412164
-
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015. PMID: 26270152
-
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013. PMID: 24304902
-
The health of children conceived by ART: 'the chicken or the egg?'.Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Mar 1;25(2):137-158. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz001. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID: 30753453 Review.
-
Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):270-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28322775 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Preconception interventions in infertile couples.J Educ Health Promot. 2014 Aug 28;3:101. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.139683. eCollection 2014. J Educ Health Promot. 2014. PMID: 25250367 Free PMC article.
-
Mothers in Same-Sex Relationships Describe the Process of Forming a Family as a Stressful Journey in a Heteronormative World: A Swedish Grounded Theory Study.Matern Child Health J. 2018 Oct;22(10):1444-1450. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2525-y. Matern Child Health J. 2018. PMID: 29740747 Free PMC article.
-
Health-promoting Lifestyle and its Demographic Predictors in Infertile Couples Referred to Infertility Clinic of Tabriz Al-Zahra Hospital, 2013.J Caring Sci. 2014 Sep 1;3(3):175-84. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.019. eCollection 2014 Sep. J Caring Sci. 2014. PMID: 25276761 Free PMC article.
-
Preconception counseling in couples undergoing fertility treatment.Int J Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;6(2):79-86. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012. PMID: 25493163 Free PMC article.
-
Lifestyle and Comorbidities: Do We Take Enough Care of Preconception Health in Assisted Reproduction?J Family Reprod Health. 2020 Sep;14(3):150-157. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v14i3.4667. J Family Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 33603806 Free PMC article.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00103-4', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00103-4'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9660416', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9660416/'}]}
- Stephen EH, Chandra A. Updated projections of infertility in the United States: 1995–2025. Fertil Steril 1998;70:30–4. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1080/14034940510032383', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940510032383'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16449038', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16449038/'}]}
- Rostad B, Schei B, Sundby J. Fertility in Norwegian women: results from a population-based health survey. Scand J Public Health 2006;34:5–10. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1093/humrep/deg366', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg366'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12923157', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12923157/'}]}
- Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, et al. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1959–66. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15931153', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15931153/'}]}
- Wright FC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005;54:1–24. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03371-X', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03371-x'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12413990', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12413990/'}]}
- Toner JP, Grainger DA, Frazier LM. Clinical outcomes among recipients of donated eggs: An analysis of the national experience, 1996–1998. Fertil Steril 2002;78:1038–45. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical