Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 Jul 3;95(1):112-7.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603200.

Insulin-like growth factors and cancer: no role in screening. Evidence from the BUPA study and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Insulin-like growth factors and cancer: no role in screening. Evidence from the BUPA study and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies

J K Morris et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured in frozen serum samples from 1051 men with cancer and 3142 controls in a nested case-control study from the British United Provident Association (BUPA) study cohort and associations with 14 cancers were examined, including prostate, colorectal, and lung. A meta-analysis of studies on these three cancer sites was also conducted. In the meta-analysis the odds ratio between the highest quartile IGF-1 group and the lowest quartile group was 1.31 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.67) for prostate, 1.37 (1.05-1.78) for colorectal and 1.02 (0.80-1.31) for lung cancer, and for IGF-2 it was 0.72 (0.36-1.44) for prostate and 1.95 (1.26-3.00) for colorectal cancer. Results from the BUPA study were consistent with the estimates from the other studies. There were no statistically significant associations with IGFBP-3 and any of the cancer sites considered. Our results suggest that IGF-1, IGF-2, and IGFBP-3 measurements have no value in cancer screening, although IGF-1 and IGF-2 may be of aetiological significance in relation to colorectal and prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prospective studies of IGF-1, IGF-2 and IGFBP-3 and prostate, colorectal and lung cancer. The studies are ordered (top down) by increasing average time interval between blood collection and cancer diagnosis.

References

    1. Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Gann PH, Ma J, Wilkinson P, Hennekens CH, Pollak MN (1998) Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Science 279: 563–566 - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Lewis SK, Voigt L, Fitzpatrick A, Plymate SR, Weiss NS (2005) Prostate carcinoma incidence in relation to prediagnostic circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3, and insulin. Cancer 103: 76–84 - PubMed
    1. Giovannucci E, Pollak MN, Platz EA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Majeed N, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE (2000) A prospective study of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 and binding protein-3 and risk of colorectal neoplasia in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9: 345–349 - PubMed
    1. Harman SM, Metter EJ, Blackman MR, Landis PK, Carter HB (2000) Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IFG-binding protein-3, and prostate-specific antigen as predictors of clinical prostate cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 4258–4265 - PubMed
    1. Hunt KJ, Toniolo P, Akhmedkhanov A, Lukanova A, Dechaud H, Rinaldi S, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Shore RE, Riboli E, Kaaks R (2002) Insulin-like growth factor 2 and colorectal cancer risk in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11: 901–905 - PubMed