Randomized phase II study of carboplatin/gemcitabine versus vinorelbine/gemcitabine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0104
- PMID: 16804877
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22024
Randomized phase II study of carboplatin/gemcitabine versus vinorelbine/gemcitabine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0104
Abstract
Background: Combined gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) and combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) are active and well tolerated chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors conducted a randomized Phase II study of GC versus GV to compare them in terms of efficacy and toxicity.
Methods: One hundred twenty-eight patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to receive either carboplatin at an area under the curve of 5 on Day 1 combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 (n = 64 patients) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 (n = 64 patients) every 3 weeks.
Results: Response rates were 20.3% for the GC patients and 21.0% for the GV patients. In the GC arm, the median survival was 432 days, and the a 1-year survival rate was 57.6%; in the GV arm, the median survival was 385 days, and the 1-year survival rate was 53.3% in the GV arm. The median progression-free survival was 165 days in the GC arm and 137 days in the GV arm. Severe hematologic toxicity (Grade 4) was significantly more frequent in the GC arm (45.3% vs. 25.8% in the GV arm; P = .022). Most notably, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the GC arm (81.3% vs. 6.5% in the GV arm; P < .001). Conversely, severe nonhematologic toxicity (Grade 3 or 4) was more common in the GV arm (7.8% vs. 19.4% in the GC arm; P = .057).
Conclusions: Although the GV and GC regimens had different toxicity profiles, there was no significant difference in survival among patients with NSCLC in the current study.
Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Randomized phase II study of carboplatin-paclitaxel or gemcitabine-vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 0004.Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;35(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318201a0f3. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21293243 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: from the German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group.J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2348-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.576. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15197195 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine plus vinorelbine followed by gemcitabine plus ifosfamide versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the treatment of chemo-naive patients with stages III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Lung Cancer. 2007 Aug;57(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 30. Lung Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17467848 Clinical Trial.
-
Options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a review and report on a phase II study of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine.Oncologist. 2001;6 Suppl 1:16-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-suppl_1-16. Oncologist. 2001. PMID: 11182000 Review.
-
Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Drugs Aging. 2002;19(9):695-721. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200219090-00006. Drugs Aging. 2002. PMID: 12381238 Review.
Cited by
-
Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line Biweekly Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Versus Biweekly Gemcitabine and Carboplatin plus Maintenance Gemcitabine in Elderly Patients with Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: LOGIK0801.Oncologist. 2020 Aug;25(8):e1146-e1157. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0322. Epub 2020 May 18. Oncologist. 2020. PMID: 32385918 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of third-generation agents.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan;139(1):25-38. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1294-z. Epub 2012 Aug 5. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 22864816 Free PMC article.
-
Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 predicts progression-free and overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.Cancer Sci. 2007 Sep;98(9):1336-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00557.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19. Cancer Sci. 2007. PMID: 17640298 Free PMC article.
-
Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine (GemVin) Regimen.Hosp Pharm. 2014 Jun;49(6):508-16. doi: 10.1310/hpj4906-508. Hosp Pharm. 2014. PMID: 24958967 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative comparison of the efficacies and safety profiles of three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 29;13:806728. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.806728. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36105225 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous