Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep;48(9):653-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0107-y. Epub 2006 Jun 29.

Does endoluminal coil embolization cause distension of intracranial aneurysms?

Affiliations

Does endoluminal coil embolization cause distension of intracranial aneurysms?

Simon C H Yu et al. Neuroradiology. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to determine whether intracranial aneurysms are distended after coil embolization and to evaluate the distensibility of ruptured aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling.

Methods: This was a prospective study of 20 consecutive patients with 22 aneurysms, who presented with a ruptured cerebral aneurysm and were treated with endovascular coiling of the aneurysm in a single institution. A diagnostic digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and a three-dimensional radiographic angiography (3DRA) were performed with bi-plane angiography equipment (Philips V5000) immediately before and after the embolization procedure to detect volume enlargement of the aneurysm after embolization, and the extent of the enlargement. A simulation study with steel spheres was carried out to study the possible error of over-estimation of the postembolization volume due to the beam-hardening artifact.

Results: There was no procedure-related rupture of the aneurysms. The percentage by volume of solid coil within the coil mass ranged from 15.78% to 82.01% in the present series. All aneurysms showed distension which ranged from 0.09% to 34.23%. The distensibility of the aneurysms was 34.23%. Error due to the beam-hardening artifact was negligible.

Conclusion: Endoluminal packing of intracranial saccular aneurysms with embolization coils could cause a certain degree of distension in aneurysms treated with coil embolization, with the degree of distension up to 34.2%. Intracranial aneurysms were able to tolerate a certain degree of endoluminal distension without a risk of immediate rupture, even those that had ruptured recently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stroke. 1998 Feb;29(2):478-85; discussion 485-6 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurgery. 1995 Oct;37(4):640-7; discussion 647-8 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg. 1993 Aug;79(2):174-82 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 2002 Oct;33(10):2536-44 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurgery. 1998 Nov;43(5):1203-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources