Inaccurate communications in telephone calls to an antimicrobial stewardship program
- PMID: 16807843
- PMCID: PMC3089022
- DOI: 10.1086/505918
Inaccurate communications in telephone calls to an antimicrobial stewardship program
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) decrease unnecessary antimicrobial use, decrease antimicrobial resistance, and improve patient outcomes. The effectiveness of a prior approval system--that is, the requirement that approval be obtained from ASP practitioners before certain antimicrobials can be used--depends on the accuracy of the patient data communicated from the primary service.
Objectives: To determine the incidence of inaccurate communication of patient data during ASP interactions, describe examples of inaccurate communications, and identify risk factors for inaccurate communication.
Design: We used a retrospective cohort design. We evaluated the communicated patient data for clinically important inaccuracies, using the patients' medical records as the gold standard.
Setting: A tertiary care medical center that has a prior approval system for restricted antimicrobials.
Patients: Inpatients discussed in telephone ASP interactions.
Intervention: Observational study.
Results: Of telephone calls requesting prior approval from ASP practitioners, 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-48%) contained an inaccuracy in at least 1 type of patient data (eg, current antimicrobial therapy); the incidence varied widely between data types. Examples of inaccuracies are given to demonstrate their clinical relevance. In multivariable analysis, inaccurate communications were more common for telephone calls from surgical services (versus calls from nonsurgical services: odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1-3.9]) and for calls received by Infectious Diseases fellows (versus pharmacists: odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.8]).
Conclusions: A high proportion of ASP calls requesting prior approval included patient data inaccuracies, which have the potential to affect the prescribing of antimicrobials. Although risk factors were identified, these communication errors were common across the different types of ASP interactions. Inaccurate communications may compromise the utility of ASPs that use a prior approval system for optimizing antimicrobial use.
Figures
References
-
- John JF, Jr, Fishman NO. Programmatic role of the infectious diseases physician in controlling antimicrobial costs in the hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:471–485. - PubMed
-
- DeLisle S, Perl TM. Antimicrobial management measures to limit resistance: A process-based conceptual framework. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:N121–N127. - PubMed
-
- Fridkin SK, Steward CD, Edwards JR, et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: project ICARE phase 2. Project Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology (ICARE) hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:245–252. - PubMed
-
- Lawton RM, Fridkin SK, Gaynes RP, McGowan JE., Jr Practices to improve antimicrobial use at 47 US hospitals: the status of the 1997 SHEA/IDSA position paper recommendations. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:256–259. - PubMed
-
- Kinky DE, Gross R, Morgan AS, Gibson GA, Fishman NO. Clinical and economic outcomes of a comprehensive antimicrobial management program (AMP) Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1998 (Abstract) - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources